author_facet Osoro, K.
Oliván, M.
Celaya, R.
Martínez, A.
Osoro, K.
Oliván, M.
Celaya, R.
Martínez, A.
author Osoro, K.
Oliván, M.
Celaya, R.
Martínez, A.
spellingShingle Osoro, K.
Oliván, M.
Celaya, R.
Martínez, A.
Grass and Forage Science
The effect of Calluna vulgaris cover on the performance and intake of ewes grazing hill pastures in northern Spain
Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law
Agronomy and Crop Science
author_sort osoro, k.
spelling Osoro, K. Oliván, M. Celaya, R. Martínez, A. 0142-5242 1365-2494 Wiley Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law Agronomy and Crop Science http://dx.doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2494.2000.00226.x <jats:p>The effect of the proportion of <jats:italic>Calluna vulgaris</jats:italic> cover on diet composition, intake and performance of sheep grazing hill vegetation communities in northern Spain is examined. A total of 591 non‐lactating Gallega ewes grazed for five consecutive grazing seasons (June to September) on replicated plots of hill pastures (1700 m.a.s.l.) composed principally of <jats:italic>Festuca</jats:italic>, <jats:italic>Agrostis</jats:italic>, <jats:italic>Nardus</jats:italic> and <jats:italic>Calluna</jats:italic> spp. but with different proportions of <jats:italic>Calluna vulgaris</jats:italic> cover, either 0·3 (C<jats:sub>0·3</jats:sub>) or 0·7 (C<jats:sub>0·7</jats:sub>) of the total area. In 1 year, twenty‐eight ewes suckling single lambs also grazed the plots. The mean stocking density over the 5 years was 8·7 ewes ha<jats:sup>–1</jats:sup>. On treatment C<jats:sub>0·3</jats:sub>, daily liveweight gains (33 g d<jats:sup>–1</jats:sup>) of non‐lactating ewes were significantly (<jats:italic>P</jats:italic> &lt; 0·001) greater than on treatment C<jats:sub>0·7</jats:sub> (12 g d<jats:sup>–1</jats:sup>). Likewise in lactating ewes the difference in mean daily liveweight change was 40 g d<jats:sup>–1</jats:sup> (–5 vs. –45 g d<jats:sup>–1</jats:sup> for C<jats:sub>0·3</jats:sub> and C<jats:sub>0·7</jats:sub> treatments respectively; <jats:italic>P</jats:italic> &lt; 0·001). Liveweight gains of lambs were only 80–100 g d<jats:sup>–1</jats:sup> from June to August and lambs only maintained live weight during August and September. The effect of lactational status on liveweight changes was not significant. Liveweight gains of non‐lactating ewes increased significantly (<jats:italic>P</jats:italic> &lt; 0·001) from the first to the last year of the experiment on both treatments.</jats:p><jats:p>The composition of the diet was significantly affected by treatment (<jats:italic>P</jats:italic> &lt; 0·001), with a higher proportion of grass species on the C<jats:sub>0·3</jats:sub> treatment and a higher digestibility of the diet in the first half of the grazing season (<jats:italic>P</jats:italic> &lt; 0·001). The proportion of <jats:italic>C. vulgaris</jats:italic> in the diet was significantly (<jats:italic>P</jats:italic> &lt; 0·001) higher on the C<jats:sub>0·7</jats:sub> treatment and increased significantly (<jats:italic>P</jats:italic> &lt; 0·001) from July to September on both treatments. There were no significant differences in the composition of the diet selected by lactating and non‐lactating ewes.</jats:p><jats:p>The results demonstrate that on hill vegetation communities, in which the grass components (<jats:italic>Festuca rubra</jats:italic>, <jats:italic>Agrostis capillaris</jats:italic>, and <jats:italic>Nardus stricta</jats:italic>) cover at least 0·3 of the area and on which the preferred grass component (<jats:italic>Festuca</jats:italic> and <jats:italic>Agrostis</jats:italic> spp.) is maintained at a sward height of at least 2·5 cm, non‐lactating ewes can increase their live weight and body condition, but this increase is influenced by the proportion and quantity of species of grass in the diet, which is affected in turn by the species of grass available and their nutritive quality. However, ewes suckling lambs were not able to maintain their live weight and body condition except when <jats:italic>Calluna</jats:italic> cover was 0·3 and grass height was more than 3·5 cm.</jats:p><jats:p>It is concluded that these indigenous vegetation communities can be used in sheep production systems to complement the use of improved pastures at other times of year. In particular, they can be utilized during the non‐lactating period (summer) to increase body condition before the beginning of the mating period in autumn.</jats:p> The effect of <i>Calluna vulgaris</i> cover on the performance and intake of ewes grazing hill pastures in northern Spain Grass and Forage Science
doi_str_mv 10.1046/j.1365-2494.2000.00226.x
facet_avail Online
finc_class_facet Wirtschaftswissenschaften
Land- und Forstwirtschaft, Gartenbau, Fischereiwirtschaft, Hauswirtschaft
format ElectronicArticle
fullrecord blob:ai-49-aHR0cDovL2R4LmRvaS5vcmcvMTAuMTA0Ni9qLjEzNjUtMjQ5NC4yMDAwLjAwMjI2Lng
id ai-49-aHR0cDovL2R4LmRvaS5vcmcvMTAuMTA0Ni9qLjEzNjUtMjQ5NC4yMDAwLjAwMjI2Lng
institution DE-Gla1
DE-Zi4
DE-15
DE-Rs1
DE-Pl11
DE-105
DE-14
DE-Ch1
DE-L229
DE-D275
DE-Bn3
DE-Brt1
DE-D161
imprint Wiley, 2000
imprint_str_mv Wiley, 2000
issn 1365-2494
0142-5242
issn_str_mv 1365-2494
0142-5242
language English
mega_collection Wiley (CrossRef)
match_str osoro2000theeffectofcallunavulgariscoverontheperformanceandintakeofewesgrazinghillpasturesinnorthernspain
publishDateSort 2000
publisher Wiley
recordtype ai
record_format ai
series Grass and Forage Science
source_id 49
title The effect of Calluna vulgaris cover on the performance and intake of ewes grazing hill pastures in northern Spain
title_unstemmed The effect of Calluna vulgaris cover on the performance and intake of ewes grazing hill pastures in northern Spain
title_full The effect of Calluna vulgaris cover on the performance and intake of ewes grazing hill pastures in northern Spain
title_fullStr The effect of Calluna vulgaris cover on the performance and intake of ewes grazing hill pastures in northern Spain
title_full_unstemmed The effect of Calluna vulgaris cover on the performance and intake of ewes grazing hill pastures in northern Spain
title_short The effect of Calluna vulgaris cover on the performance and intake of ewes grazing hill pastures in northern Spain
title_sort the effect of <i>calluna vulgaris</i> cover on the performance and intake of ewes grazing hill pastures in northern spain
topic Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law
Agronomy and Crop Science
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2494.2000.00226.x
publishDate 2000
physical 300-308
description <jats:p>The effect of the proportion of <jats:italic>Calluna vulgaris</jats:italic> cover on diet composition, intake and performance of sheep grazing hill vegetation communities in northern Spain is examined. A total of 591 non‐lactating Gallega ewes grazed for five consecutive grazing seasons (June to September) on replicated plots of hill pastures (1700 m.a.s.l.) composed principally of <jats:italic>Festuca</jats:italic>, <jats:italic>Agrostis</jats:italic>, <jats:italic>Nardus</jats:italic> and <jats:italic>Calluna</jats:italic> spp. but with different proportions of <jats:italic>Calluna vulgaris</jats:italic> cover, either 0·3 (C<jats:sub>0·3</jats:sub>) or 0·7 (C<jats:sub>0·7</jats:sub>) of the total area. In 1 year, twenty‐eight ewes suckling single lambs also grazed the plots. The mean stocking density over the 5 years was 8·7 ewes ha<jats:sup>–1</jats:sup>. On treatment C<jats:sub>0·3</jats:sub>, daily liveweight gains (33 g d<jats:sup>–1</jats:sup>) of non‐lactating ewes were significantly (<jats:italic>P</jats:italic> &lt; 0·001) greater than on treatment C<jats:sub>0·7</jats:sub> (12 g d<jats:sup>–1</jats:sup>). Likewise in lactating ewes the difference in mean daily liveweight change was 40 g d<jats:sup>–1</jats:sup> (–5 vs. –45 g d<jats:sup>–1</jats:sup> for C<jats:sub>0·3</jats:sub> and C<jats:sub>0·7</jats:sub> treatments respectively; <jats:italic>P</jats:italic> &lt; 0·001). Liveweight gains of lambs were only 80–100 g d<jats:sup>–1</jats:sup> from June to August and lambs only maintained live weight during August and September. The effect of lactational status on liveweight changes was not significant. Liveweight gains of non‐lactating ewes increased significantly (<jats:italic>P</jats:italic> &lt; 0·001) from the first to the last year of the experiment on both treatments.</jats:p><jats:p>The composition of the diet was significantly affected by treatment (<jats:italic>P</jats:italic> &lt; 0·001), with a higher proportion of grass species on the C<jats:sub>0·3</jats:sub> treatment and a higher digestibility of the diet in the first half of the grazing season (<jats:italic>P</jats:italic> &lt; 0·001). The proportion of <jats:italic>C. vulgaris</jats:italic> in the diet was significantly (<jats:italic>P</jats:italic> &lt; 0·001) higher on the C<jats:sub>0·7</jats:sub> treatment and increased significantly (<jats:italic>P</jats:italic> &lt; 0·001) from July to September on both treatments. There were no significant differences in the composition of the diet selected by lactating and non‐lactating ewes.</jats:p><jats:p>The results demonstrate that on hill vegetation communities, in which the grass components (<jats:italic>Festuca rubra</jats:italic>, <jats:italic>Agrostis capillaris</jats:italic>, and <jats:italic>Nardus stricta</jats:italic>) cover at least 0·3 of the area and on which the preferred grass component (<jats:italic>Festuca</jats:italic> and <jats:italic>Agrostis</jats:italic> spp.) is maintained at a sward height of at least 2·5 cm, non‐lactating ewes can increase their live weight and body condition, but this increase is influenced by the proportion and quantity of species of grass in the diet, which is affected in turn by the species of grass available and their nutritive quality. However, ewes suckling lambs were not able to maintain their live weight and body condition except when <jats:italic>Calluna</jats:italic> cover was 0·3 and grass height was more than 3·5 cm.</jats:p><jats:p>It is concluded that these indigenous vegetation communities can be used in sheep production systems to complement the use of improved pastures at other times of year. In particular, they can be utilized during the non‐lactating period (summer) to increase body condition before the beginning of the mating period in autumn.</jats:p>
container_issue 4
container_start_page 300
container_title Grass and Forage Science
container_volume 55
format_de105 Article, E-Article
format_de14 Article, E-Article
format_de15 Article, E-Article
format_de520 Article, E-Article
format_de540 Article, E-Article
format_dech1 Article, E-Article
format_ded117 Article, E-Article
format_degla1 E-Article
format_del152 Buch
format_del189 Article, E-Article
format_dezi4 Article
format_dezwi2 Article, E-Article
format_finc Article, E-Article
format_nrw Article, E-Article
_version_ 1792337359632597003
geogr_code not assigned
last_indexed 2024-03-01T15:14:17.728Z
geogr_code_person not assigned
openURL url_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fvufind.svn.sourceforge.net%3Agenerator&rft.title=The+effect+of+Calluna+vulgaris+cover+on+the+performance+and+intake+of+ewes+grazing+hill+pastures+in+northern+Spain&rft.date=2000-12-08&genre=article&issn=1365-2494&volume=55&issue=4&spage=300&epage=308&pages=300-308&jtitle=Grass+and+Forage+Science&atitle=The+effect+of+%3Ci%3ECalluna+vulgaris%3C%2Fi%3E+cover+on+the+performance+and+intake+of+ewes+grazing+hill+pastures+in+northern+Spain&aulast=Mart%C3%ADnez&aufirst=A.&rft_id=info%3Adoi%2F10.1046%2Fj.1365-2494.2000.00226.x&rft.language%5B0%5D=eng
SOLR
_version_ 1792337359632597003
author Osoro, K., Oliván, M., Celaya, R., Martínez, A.
author_facet Osoro, K., Oliván, M., Celaya, R., Martínez, A., Osoro, K., Oliván, M., Celaya, R., Martínez, A.
author_sort osoro, k.
container_issue 4
container_start_page 300
container_title Grass and Forage Science
container_volume 55
description <jats:p>The effect of the proportion of <jats:italic>Calluna vulgaris</jats:italic> cover on diet composition, intake and performance of sheep grazing hill vegetation communities in northern Spain is examined. A total of 591 non‐lactating Gallega ewes grazed for five consecutive grazing seasons (June to September) on replicated plots of hill pastures (1700 m.a.s.l.) composed principally of <jats:italic>Festuca</jats:italic>, <jats:italic>Agrostis</jats:italic>, <jats:italic>Nardus</jats:italic> and <jats:italic>Calluna</jats:italic> spp. but with different proportions of <jats:italic>Calluna vulgaris</jats:italic> cover, either 0·3 (C<jats:sub>0·3</jats:sub>) or 0·7 (C<jats:sub>0·7</jats:sub>) of the total area. In 1 year, twenty‐eight ewes suckling single lambs also grazed the plots. The mean stocking density over the 5 years was 8·7 ewes ha<jats:sup>–1</jats:sup>. On treatment C<jats:sub>0·3</jats:sub>, daily liveweight gains (33 g d<jats:sup>–1</jats:sup>) of non‐lactating ewes were significantly (<jats:italic>P</jats:italic> &lt; 0·001) greater than on treatment C<jats:sub>0·7</jats:sub> (12 g d<jats:sup>–1</jats:sup>). Likewise in lactating ewes the difference in mean daily liveweight change was 40 g d<jats:sup>–1</jats:sup> (–5 vs. –45 g d<jats:sup>–1</jats:sup> for C<jats:sub>0·3</jats:sub> and C<jats:sub>0·7</jats:sub> treatments respectively; <jats:italic>P</jats:italic> &lt; 0·001). Liveweight gains of lambs were only 80–100 g d<jats:sup>–1</jats:sup> from June to August and lambs only maintained live weight during August and September. The effect of lactational status on liveweight changes was not significant. Liveweight gains of non‐lactating ewes increased significantly (<jats:italic>P</jats:italic> &lt; 0·001) from the first to the last year of the experiment on both treatments.</jats:p><jats:p>The composition of the diet was significantly affected by treatment (<jats:italic>P</jats:italic> &lt; 0·001), with a higher proportion of grass species on the C<jats:sub>0·3</jats:sub> treatment and a higher digestibility of the diet in the first half of the grazing season (<jats:italic>P</jats:italic> &lt; 0·001). The proportion of <jats:italic>C. vulgaris</jats:italic> in the diet was significantly (<jats:italic>P</jats:italic> &lt; 0·001) higher on the C<jats:sub>0·7</jats:sub> treatment and increased significantly (<jats:italic>P</jats:italic> &lt; 0·001) from July to September on both treatments. There were no significant differences in the composition of the diet selected by lactating and non‐lactating ewes.</jats:p><jats:p>The results demonstrate that on hill vegetation communities, in which the grass components (<jats:italic>Festuca rubra</jats:italic>, <jats:italic>Agrostis capillaris</jats:italic>, and <jats:italic>Nardus stricta</jats:italic>) cover at least 0·3 of the area and on which the preferred grass component (<jats:italic>Festuca</jats:italic> and <jats:italic>Agrostis</jats:italic> spp.) is maintained at a sward height of at least 2·5 cm, non‐lactating ewes can increase their live weight and body condition, but this increase is influenced by the proportion and quantity of species of grass in the diet, which is affected in turn by the species of grass available and their nutritive quality. However, ewes suckling lambs were not able to maintain their live weight and body condition except when <jats:italic>Calluna</jats:italic> cover was 0·3 and grass height was more than 3·5 cm.</jats:p><jats:p>It is concluded that these indigenous vegetation communities can be used in sheep production systems to complement the use of improved pastures at other times of year. In particular, they can be utilized during the non‐lactating period (summer) to increase body condition before the beginning of the mating period in autumn.</jats:p>
doi_str_mv 10.1046/j.1365-2494.2000.00226.x
facet_avail Online
finc_class_facet Wirtschaftswissenschaften, Land- und Forstwirtschaft, Gartenbau, Fischereiwirtschaft, Hauswirtschaft
format ElectronicArticle
format_de105 Article, E-Article
format_de14 Article, E-Article
format_de15 Article, E-Article
format_de520 Article, E-Article
format_de540 Article, E-Article
format_dech1 Article, E-Article
format_ded117 Article, E-Article
format_degla1 E-Article
format_del152 Buch
format_del189 Article, E-Article
format_dezi4 Article
format_dezwi2 Article, E-Article
format_finc Article, E-Article
format_nrw Article, E-Article
geogr_code not assigned
geogr_code_person not assigned
id ai-49-aHR0cDovL2R4LmRvaS5vcmcvMTAuMTA0Ni9qLjEzNjUtMjQ5NC4yMDAwLjAwMjI2Lng
imprint Wiley, 2000
imprint_str_mv Wiley, 2000
institution DE-Gla1, DE-Zi4, DE-15, DE-Rs1, DE-Pl11, DE-105, DE-14, DE-Ch1, DE-L229, DE-D275, DE-Bn3, DE-Brt1, DE-D161
issn 1365-2494, 0142-5242
issn_str_mv 1365-2494, 0142-5242
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-01T15:14:17.728Z
match_str osoro2000theeffectofcallunavulgariscoverontheperformanceandintakeofewesgrazinghillpasturesinnorthernspain
mega_collection Wiley (CrossRef)
physical 300-308
publishDate 2000
publishDateSort 2000
publisher Wiley
record_format ai
recordtype ai
series Grass and Forage Science
source_id 49
spelling Osoro, K. Oliván, M. Celaya, R. Martínez, A. 0142-5242 1365-2494 Wiley Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law Agronomy and Crop Science http://dx.doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2494.2000.00226.x <jats:p>The effect of the proportion of <jats:italic>Calluna vulgaris</jats:italic> cover on diet composition, intake and performance of sheep grazing hill vegetation communities in northern Spain is examined. A total of 591 non‐lactating Gallega ewes grazed for five consecutive grazing seasons (June to September) on replicated plots of hill pastures (1700 m.a.s.l.) composed principally of <jats:italic>Festuca</jats:italic>, <jats:italic>Agrostis</jats:italic>, <jats:italic>Nardus</jats:italic> and <jats:italic>Calluna</jats:italic> spp. but with different proportions of <jats:italic>Calluna vulgaris</jats:italic> cover, either 0·3 (C<jats:sub>0·3</jats:sub>) or 0·7 (C<jats:sub>0·7</jats:sub>) of the total area. In 1 year, twenty‐eight ewes suckling single lambs also grazed the plots. The mean stocking density over the 5 years was 8·7 ewes ha<jats:sup>–1</jats:sup>. On treatment C<jats:sub>0·3</jats:sub>, daily liveweight gains (33 g d<jats:sup>–1</jats:sup>) of non‐lactating ewes were significantly (<jats:italic>P</jats:italic> &lt; 0·001) greater than on treatment C<jats:sub>0·7</jats:sub> (12 g d<jats:sup>–1</jats:sup>). Likewise in lactating ewes the difference in mean daily liveweight change was 40 g d<jats:sup>–1</jats:sup> (–5 vs. –45 g d<jats:sup>–1</jats:sup> for C<jats:sub>0·3</jats:sub> and C<jats:sub>0·7</jats:sub> treatments respectively; <jats:italic>P</jats:italic> &lt; 0·001). Liveweight gains of lambs were only 80–100 g d<jats:sup>–1</jats:sup> from June to August and lambs only maintained live weight during August and September. The effect of lactational status on liveweight changes was not significant. Liveweight gains of non‐lactating ewes increased significantly (<jats:italic>P</jats:italic> &lt; 0·001) from the first to the last year of the experiment on both treatments.</jats:p><jats:p>The composition of the diet was significantly affected by treatment (<jats:italic>P</jats:italic> &lt; 0·001), with a higher proportion of grass species on the C<jats:sub>0·3</jats:sub> treatment and a higher digestibility of the diet in the first half of the grazing season (<jats:italic>P</jats:italic> &lt; 0·001). The proportion of <jats:italic>C. vulgaris</jats:italic> in the diet was significantly (<jats:italic>P</jats:italic> &lt; 0·001) higher on the C<jats:sub>0·7</jats:sub> treatment and increased significantly (<jats:italic>P</jats:italic> &lt; 0·001) from July to September on both treatments. There were no significant differences in the composition of the diet selected by lactating and non‐lactating ewes.</jats:p><jats:p>The results demonstrate that on hill vegetation communities, in which the grass components (<jats:italic>Festuca rubra</jats:italic>, <jats:italic>Agrostis capillaris</jats:italic>, and <jats:italic>Nardus stricta</jats:italic>) cover at least 0·3 of the area and on which the preferred grass component (<jats:italic>Festuca</jats:italic> and <jats:italic>Agrostis</jats:italic> spp.) is maintained at a sward height of at least 2·5 cm, non‐lactating ewes can increase their live weight and body condition, but this increase is influenced by the proportion and quantity of species of grass in the diet, which is affected in turn by the species of grass available and their nutritive quality. However, ewes suckling lambs were not able to maintain their live weight and body condition except when <jats:italic>Calluna</jats:italic> cover was 0·3 and grass height was more than 3·5 cm.</jats:p><jats:p>It is concluded that these indigenous vegetation communities can be used in sheep production systems to complement the use of improved pastures at other times of year. In particular, they can be utilized during the non‐lactating period (summer) to increase body condition before the beginning of the mating period in autumn.</jats:p> The effect of <i>Calluna vulgaris</i> cover on the performance and intake of ewes grazing hill pastures in northern Spain Grass and Forage Science
spellingShingle Osoro, K., Oliván, M., Celaya, R., Martínez, A., Grass and Forage Science, The effect of Calluna vulgaris cover on the performance and intake of ewes grazing hill pastures in northern Spain, Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law, Agronomy and Crop Science
title The effect of Calluna vulgaris cover on the performance and intake of ewes grazing hill pastures in northern Spain
title_full The effect of Calluna vulgaris cover on the performance and intake of ewes grazing hill pastures in northern Spain
title_fullStr The effect of Calluna vulgaris cover on the performance and intake of ewes grazing hill pastures in northern Spain
title_full_unstemmed The effect of Calluna vulgaris cover on the performance and intake of ewes grazing hill pastures in northern Spain
title_short The effect of Calluna vulgaris cover on the performance and intake of ewes grazing hill pastures in northern Spain
title_sort the effect of <i>calluna vulgaris</i> cover on the performance and intake of ewes grazing hill pastures in northern spain
title_unstemmed The effect of Calluna vulgaris cover on the performance and intake of ewes grazing hill pastures in northern Spain
topic Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law, Agronomy and Crop Science
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2494.2000.00226.x