Eintrag weiter verarbeiten
Cervical screening in England and Wales: its effect has been underestimated
Gespeichert in:
| Zeitschriftentitel: | Cytopathology |
|---|---|
| Personen und Körperschaften: | |
| In: | Cytopathology, 11, 2000, 6, S. 471-479 |
| Format: | E-Article |
| Sprache: | Englisch |
| veröffentlicht: |
Wiley
|
| Schlagwörter: |
| author_facet |
Herbert, A. Herbert, A. |
|---|---|
| author |
Herbert, A. |
| spellingShingle |
Herbert, A. Cytopathology Cervical screening in England and Wales: its effect has been underestimated General Medicine Histology Pathology and Forensic Medicine |
| author_sort |
herbert, a. |
| spelling |
Herbert, A. 0956-5507 1365-2303 Wiley General Medicine Histology Pathology and Forensic Medicine http://dx.doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2303.2000.00272.x <jats:p>Opinions about cervical screening in the UK tend to follow one of two negative lines of thought. The first is that cervical cancer is a rare disease, and too much time and effort are spent on screening. The second is that it has been relatively ineffective, since incidence of invasive carcinoma did not fall until the NHS Cervical Screening Programme (NHSCSP) was introduced in 1988, although it fell by 40% since then. This paper presents publicly available data to demonstrate that neither of these views is true. Registrations of invasive carcinoma of the uterine cervix and carcinoma <jats:italic>in situ</jats:italic> in England and Wales between 1971 and 1996 show that a substantially increased risk of disease in women born since 1940 has been reversed, almost certainly by greatly improved screening. Cervical carcinoma is now a rare disease because most cases are prevented before they become invasive, mostly by screening young women, aged 20–40, before the decade of life when symptomatic cervical carcinoma most frequently presents.</jats:p> Cervical screening in England and Wales: its effect has been underestimated Cytopathology |
| doi_str_mv |
10.1046/j.1365-2303.2000.00272.x |
| facet_avail |
Online |
| finc_class_facet |
Biologie Medizin |
| format |
ElectronicArticle |
| fullrecord |
blob:ai-49-aHR0cDovL2R4LmRvaS5vcmcvMTAuMTA0Ni9qLjEzNjUtMjMwMy4yMDAwLjAwMjcyLng |
| id |
ai-49-aHR0cDovL2R4LmRvaS5vcmcvMTAuMTA0Ni9qLjEzNjUtMjMwMy4yMDAwLjAwMjcyLng |
| institution |
DE-Zi4 DE-Gla1 DE-15 DE-Pl11 DE-Rs1 DE-14 DE-105 DE-Ch1 DE-L229 DE-D275 DE-Bn3 DE-Brt1 DE-D161 |
| imprint |
Wiley, 2000 |
| imprint_str_mv |
Wiley, 2000 |
| issn |
0956-5507 1365-2303 |
| issn_str_mv |
0956-5507 1365-2303 |
| language |
English |
| mega_collection |
Wiley (CrossRef) |
| match_str |
herbert2000cervicalscreeninginenglandandwalesitseffecthasbeenunderestimated |
| publishDateSort |
2000 |
| publisher |
Wiley |
| recordtype |
ai |
| record_format |
ai |
| series |
Cytopathology |
| source_id |
49 |
| title |
Cervical screening in England and Wales: its effect has been underestimated |
| title_unstemmed |
Cervical screening in England and Wales: its effect has been underestimated |
| title_full |
Cervical screening in England and Wales: its effect has been underestimated |
| title_fullStr |
Cervical screening in England and Wales: its effect has been underestimated |
| title_full_unstemmed |
Cervical screening in England and Wales: its effect has been underestimated |
| title_short |
Cervical screening in England and Wales: its effect has been underestimated |
| title_sort |
cervical screening in england and wales: its effect has been underestimated |
| topic |
General Medicine Histology Pathology and Forensic Medicine |
| url |
http://dx.doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2303.2000.00272.x |
| publishDate |
2000 |
| physical |
471-479 |
| description |
<jats:p>Opinions about cervical screening in the UK tend to follow one of two negative lines of thought. The first is that cervical cancer is a rare disease, and too much time and effort are spent on screening. The second is that it has been relatively ineffective, since incidence of invasive carcinoma did not fall until the NHS Cervical Screening Programme (NHSCSP) was introduced in 1988, although it fell by 40% since then. This paper presents publicly available data to demonstrate that neither of these views is true. Registrations of invasive carcinoma of the uterine cervix and carcinoma <jats:italic>in situ</jats:italic> in England and Wales between 1971 and 1996 show that a substantially increased risk of disease in women born since 1940 has been reversed, almost certainly by greatly improved screening. Cervical carcinoma is now a rare disease because most cases are prevented before they become invasive, mostly by screening young women, aged 20–40, before the decade of life when symptomatic cervical carcinoma most frequently presents.</jats:p> |
| container_issue |
6 |
| container_start_page |
471 |
| container_title |
Cytopathology |
| container_volume |
11 |
| format_de105 |
Article, E-Article |
| format_de14 |
Article, E-Article |
| format_de15 |
Article, E-Article |
| format_de520 |
Article, E-Article |
| format_de540 |
Article, E-Article |
| format_dech1 |
Article, E-Article |
| format_ded117 |
Article, E-Article |
| format_degla1 |
E-Article |
| format_del152 |
Buch |
| format_del189 |
Article, E-Article |
| format_dezi4 |
Article |
| format_dezwi2 |
Article, E-Article |
| format_finc |
Article, E-Article |
| format_nrw |
Article, E-Article |
| _version_ |
1792337358645886985 |
| geogr_code |
not assigned |
| last_indexed |
2024-03-01T15:14:17.351Z |
| geogr_code_person |
not assigned |
| openURL |
url_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fvufind.svn.sourceforge.net%3Agenerator&rft.title=Cervical+screening+in+England+and+Wales%3A+its+effect+has+been+underestimated&rft.date=2000-12-01&genre=article&issn=1365-2303&volume=11&issue=6&spage=471&epage=479&pages=471-479&jtitle=Cytopathology&atitle=Cervical+screening+in+England+and+Wales%3A+its+effect+has+been+underestimated&aulast=Herbert&aufirst=A.&rft_id=info%3Adoi%2F10.1046%2Fj.1365-2303.2000.00272.x&rft.language%5B0%5D=eng |
| SOLR | |
| _version_ | 1792337358645886985 |
| author | Herbert, A. |
| author_facet | Herbert, A., Herbert, A. |
| author_sort | herbert, a. |
| container_issue | 6 |
| container_start_page | 471 |
| container_title | Cytopathology |
| container_volume | 11 |
| description | <jats:p>Opinions about cervical screening in the UK tend to follow one of two negative lines of thought. The first is that cervical cancer is a rare disease, and too much time and effort are spent on screening. The second is that it has been relatively ineffective, since incidence of invasive carcinoma did not fall until the NHS Cervical Screening Programme (NHSCSP) was introduced in 1988, although it fell by 40% since then. This paper presents publicly available data to demonstrate that neither of these views is true. Registrations of invasive carcinoma of the uterine cervix and carcinoma <jats:italic>in situ</jats:italic> in England and Wales between 1971 and 1996 show that a substantially increased risk of disease in women born since 1940 has been reversed, almost certainly by greatly improved screening. Cervical carcinoma is now a rare disease because most cases are prevented before they become invasive, mostly by screening young women, aged 20–40, before the decade of life when symptomatic cervical carcinoma most frequently presents.</jats:p> |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1046/j.1365-2303.2000.00272.x |
| facet_avail | Online |
| finc_class_facet | Biologie, Medizin |
| format | ElectronicArticle |
| format_de105 | Article, E-Article |
| format_de14 | Article, E-Article |
| format_de15 | Article, E-Article |
| format_de520 | Article, E-Article |
| format_de540 | Article, E-Article |
| format_dech1 | Article, E-Article |
| format_ded117 | Article, E-Article |
| format_degla1 | E-Article |
| format_del152 | Buch |
| format_del189 | Article, E-Article |
| format_dezi4 | Article |
| format_dezwi2 | Article, E-Article |
| format_finc | Article, E-Article |
| format_nrw | Article, E-Article |
| geogr_code | not assigned |
| geogr_code_person | not assigned |
| id | ai-49-aHR0cDovL2R4LmRvaS5vcmcvMTAuMTA0Ni9qLjEzNjUtMjMwMy4yMDAwLjAwMjcyLng |
| imprint | Wiley, 2000 |
| imprint_str_mv | Wiley, 2000 |
| institution | DE-Zi4, DE-Gla1, DE-15, DE-Pl11, DE-Rs1, DE-14, DE-105, DE-Ch1, DE-L229, DE-D275, DE-Bn3, DE-Brt1, DE-D161 |
| issn | 0956-5507, 1365-2303 |
| issn_str_mv | 0956-5507, 1365-2303 |
| language | English |
| last_indexed | 2024-03-01T15:14:17.351Z |
| match_str | herbert2000cervicalscreeninginenglandandwalesitseffecthasbeenunderestimated |
| mega_collection | Wiley (CrossRef) |
| physical | 471-479 |
| publishDate | 2000 |
| publishDateSort | 2000 |
| publisher | Wiley |
| record_format | ai |
| recordtype | ai |
| series | Cytopathology |
| source_id | 49 |
| spelling | Herbert, A. 0956-5507 1365-2303 Wiley General Medicine Histology Pathology and Forensic Medicine http://dx.doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2303.2000.00272.x <jats:p>Opinions about cervical screening in the UK tend to follow one of two negative lines of thought. The first is that cervical cancer is a rare disease, and too much time and effort are spent on screening. The second is that it has been relatively ineffective, since incidence of invasive carcinoma did not fall until the NHS Cervical Screening Programme (NHSCSP) was introduced in 1988, although it fell by 40% since then. This paper presents publicly available data to demonstrate that neither of these views is true. Registrations of invasive carcinoma of the uterine cervix and carcinoma <jats:italic>in situ</jats:italic> in England and Wales between 1971 and 1996 show that a substantially increased risk of disease in women born since 1940 has been reversed, almost certainly by greatly improved screening. Cervical carcinoma is now a rare disease because most cases are prevented before they become invasive, mostly by screening young women, aged 20–40, before the decade of life when symptomatic cervical carcinoma most frequently presents.</jats:p> Cervical screening in England and Wales: its effect has been underestimated Cytopathology |
| spellingShingle | Herbert, A., Cytopathology, Cervical screening in England and Wales: its effect has been underestimated, General Medicine, Histology, Pathology and Forensic Medicine |
| title | Cervical screening in England and Wales: its effect has been underestimated |
| title_full | Cervical screening in England and Wales: its effect has been underestimated |
| title_fullStr | Cervical screening in England and Wales: its effect has been underestimated |
| title_full_unstemmed | Cervical screening in England and Wales: its effect has been underestimated |
| title_short | Cervical screening in England and Wales: its effect has been underestimated |
| title_sort | cervical screening in england and wales: its effect has been underestimated |
| title_unstemmed | Cervical screening in England and Wales: its effect has been underestimated |
| topic | General Medicine, Histology, Pathology and Forensic Medicine |
| url | http://dx.doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2303.2000.00272.x |