author_facet McClelland, J. F.
Saunders, K. J.
McClelland, J. F.
Saunders, K. J.
author McClelland, J. F.
Saunders, K. J.
spellingShingle McClelland, J. F.
Saunders, K. J.
Ophthalmic and Physiological Optics
The repeatability and validity of dynamic retinoscopy in assessing the accommodative response
Sensory Systems
Optometry
Ophthalmology
author_sort mcclelland, j. f.
spelling McClelland, J. F. Saunders, K. J. 0275-5408 1475-1313 Wiley Sensory Systems Optometry Ophthalmology http://dx.doi.org/10.1046/j.1475-1313.2003.00113.x <jats:title>Abstract</jats:title><jats:p>Dynamic retinoscopy (DR) is an objective technique that has been used successfully to examine accommodative function of non‐communicative patients. However, there are few studies examining its repeatability and validity. This paper addresses the repeatability and validity of a form of DR (a modified Nott technique), by comparing results to the Shin‐Nippon SRW‐5000 Autorefractor whose validity and repeatability have previously been demonstrated. Accommodative responses of 41 subjects (aged 6–43 years) were assessed using DR and the Shin‐Nippon SRW‐5000 Autorefractor. Three different target demands were used (10, 6 and 4 D). DR was shown to be repeatable for all target demands (paired <jats:italic>t</jats:italic>‐test, <jats:italic>p</jats:italic> &gt; 0.05). The results demonstrated good agreement between the autorefractor and DR. The results of the present study suggest that DR is a repeatable and valid objective technique for assessing accommodative function.</jats:p> The repeatability and validity of dynamic retinoscopy in assessing the accommodative response Ophthalmic and Physiological Optics
doi_str_mv 10.1046/j.1475-1313.2003.00113.x
facet_avail Online
finc_class_facet Technik
Medizin
format ElectronicArticle
fullrecord blob:ai-49-aHR0cDovL2R4LmRvaS5vcmcvMTAuMTA0Ni9qLjE0NzUtMTMxMy4yMDAzLjAwMTEzLng
id ai-49-aHR0cDovL2R4LmRvaS5vcmcvMTAuMTA0Ni9qLjE0NzUtMTMxMy4yMDAzLjAwMTEzLng
institution DE-D275
DE-Bn3
DE-Brt1
DE-D161
DE-Gla1
DE-Zi4
DE-15
DE-Pl11
DE-Rs1
DE-105
DE-14
DE-Ch1
DE-L229
imprint Wiley, 2003
imprint_str_mv Wiley, 2003
issn 0275-5408
1475-1313
issn_str_mv 0275-5408
1475-1313
language English
mega_collection Wiley (CrossRef)
match_str mcclelland2003therepeatabilityandvalidityofdynamicretinoscopyinassessingtheaccommodativeresponse
publishDateSort 2003
publisher Wiley
recordtype ai
record_format ai
series Ophthalmic and Physiological Optics
source_id 49
title The repeatability and validity of dynamic retinoscopy in assessing the accommodative response
title_unstemmed The repeatability and validity of dynamic retinoscopy in assessing the accommodative response
title_full The repeatability and validity of dynamic retinoscopy in assessing the accommodative response
title_fullStr The repeatability and validity of dynamic retinoscopy in assessing the accommodative response
title_full_unstemmed The repeatability and validity of dynamic retinoscopy in assessing the accommodative response
title_short The repeatability and validity of dynamic retinoscopy in assessing the accommodative response
title_sort the repeatability and validity of dynamic retinoscopy in assessing the accommodative response
topic Sensory Systems
Optometry
Ophthalmology
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1046/j.1475-1313.2003.00113.x
publishDate 2003
physical 243-250
description <jats:title>Abstract</jats:title><jats:p>Dynamic retinoscopy (DR) is an objective technique that has been used successfully to examine accommodative function of non‐communicative patients. However, there are few studies examining its repeatability and validity. This paper addresses the repeatability and validity of a form of DR (a modified Nott technique), by comparing results to the Shin‐Nippon SRW‐5000 Autorefractor whose validity and repeatability have previously been demonstrated. Accommodative responses of 41 subjects (aged 6–43 years) were assessed using DR and the Shin‐Nippon SRW‐5000 Autorefractor. Three different target demands were used (10, 6 and 4 D). DR was shown to be repeatable for all target demands (paired <jats:italic>t</jats:italic>‐test, <jats:italic>p</jats:italic> &gt; 0.05). The results demonstrated good agreement between the autorefractor and DR. The results of the present study suggest that DR is a repeatable and valid objective technique for assessing accommodative function.</jats:p>
container_issue 3
container_start_page 243
container_title Ophthalmic and Physiological Optics
container_volume 23
format_de105 Article, E-Article
format_de14 Article, E-Article
format_de15 Article, E-Article
format_de520 Article, E-Article
format_de540 Article, E-Article
format_dech1 Article, E-Article
format_ded117 Article, E-Article
format_degla1 E-Article
format_del152 Buch
format_del189 Article, E-Article
format_dezi4 Article
format_dezwi2 Article, E-Article
format_finc Article, E-Article
format_nrw Article, E-Article
_version_ 1792336066142797828
geogr_code not assigned
last_indexed 2024-03-01T14:54:29.695Z
geogr_code_person not assigned
openURL url_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fvufind.svn.sourceforge.net%3Agenerator&rft.title=The+repeatability+and+validity+of+dynamic+retinoscopy+in+assessing+the+accommodative+response&rft.date=2003-05-01&genre=article&issn=1475-1313&volume=23&issue=3&spage=243&epage=250&pages=243-250&jtitle=Ophthalmic+and+Physiological+Optics&atitle=The+repeatability+and+validity+of+dynamic+retinoscopy+in+assessing+the+accommodative+response&aulast=Saunders&aufirst=K.+J.&rft_id=info%3Adoi%2F10.1046%2Fj.1475-1313.2003.00113.x&rft.language%5B0%5D=eng
SOLR
_version_ 1792336066142797828
author McClelland, J. F., Saunders, K. J.
author_facet McClelland, J. F., Saunders, K. J., McClelland, J. F., Saunders, K. J.
author_sort mcclelland, j. f.
container_issue 3
container_start_page 243
container_title Ophthalmic and Physiological Optics
container_volume 23
description <jats:title>Abstract</jats:title><jats:p>Dynamic retinoscopy (DR) is an objective technique that has been used successfully to examine accommodative function of non‐communicative patients. However, there are few studies examining its repeatability and validity. This paper addresses the repeatability and validity of a form of DR (a modified Nott technique), by comparing results to the Shin‐Nippon SRW‐5000 Autorefractor whose validity and repeatability have previously been demonstrated. Accommodative responses of 41 subjects (aged 6–43 years) were assessed using DR and the Shin‐Nippon SRW‐5000 Autorefractor. Three different target demands were used (10, 6 and 4 D). DR was shown to be repeatable for all target demands (paired <jats:italic>t</jats:italic>‐test, <jats:italic>p</jats:italic> &gt; 0.05). The results demonstrated good agreement between the autorefractor and DR. The results of the present study suggest that DR is a repeatable and valid objective technique for assessing accommodative function.</jats:p>
doi_str_mv 10.1046/j.1475-1313.2003.00113.x
facet_avail Online
finc_class_facet Technik, Medizin
format ElectronicArticle
format_de105 Article, E-Article
format_de14 Article, E-Article
format_de15 Article, E-Article
format_de520 Article, E-Article
format_de540 Article, E-Article
format_dech1 Article, E-Article
format_ded117 Article, E-Article
format_degla1 E-Article
format_del152 Buch
format_del189 Article, E-Article
format_dezi4 Article
format_dezwi2 Article, E-Article
format_finc Article, E-Article
format_nrw Article, E-Article
geogr_code not assigned
geogr_code_person not assigned
id ai-49-aHR0cDovL2R4LmRvaS5vcmcvMTAuMTA0Ni9qLjE0NzUtMTMxMy4yMDAzLjAwMTEzLng
imprint Wiley, 2003
imprint_str_mv Wiley, 2003
institution DE-D275, DE-Bn3, DE-Brt1, DE-D161, DE-Gla1, DE-Zi4, DE-15, DE-Pl11, DE-Rs1, DE-105, DE-14, DE-Ch1, DE-L229
issn 0275-5408, 1475-1313
issn_str_mv 0275-5408, 1475-1313
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-01T14:54:29.695Z
match_str mcclelland2003therepeatabilityandvalidityofdynamicretinoscopyinassessingtheaccommodativeresponse
mega_collection Wiley (CrossRef)
physical 243-250
publishDate 2003
publishDateSort 2003
publisher Wiley
record_format ai
recordtype ai
series Ophthalmic and Physiological Optics
source_id 49
spelling McClelland, J. F. Saunders, K. J. 0275-5408 1475-1313 Wiley Sensory Systems Optometry Ophthalmology http://dx.doi.org/10.1046/j.1475-1313.2003.00113.x <jats:title>Abstract</jats:title><jats:p>Dynamic retinoscopy (DR) is an objective technique that has been used successfully to examine accommodative function of non‐communicative patients. However, there are few studies examining its repeatability and validity. This paper addresses the repeatability and validity of a form of DR (a modified Nott technique), by comparing results to the Shin‐Nippon SRW‐5000 Autorefractor whose validity and repeatability have previously been demonstrated. Accommodative responses of 41 subjects (aged 6–43 years) were assessed using DR and the Shin‐Nippon SRW‐5000 Autorefractor. Three different target demands were used (10, 6 and 4 D). DR was shown to be repeatable for all target demands (paired <jats:italic>t</jats:italic>‐test, <jats:italic>p</jats:italic> &gt; 0.05). The results demonstrated good agreement between the autorefractor and DR. The results of the present study suggest that DR is a repeatable and valid objective technique for assessing accommodative function.</jats:p> The repeatability and validity of dynamic retinoscopy in assessing the accommodative response Ophthalmic and Physiological Optics
spellingShingle McClelland, J. F., Saunders, K. J., Ophthalmic and Physiological Optics, The repeatability and validity of dynamic retinoscopy in assessing the accommodative response, Sensory Systems, Optometry, Ophthalmology
title The repeatability and validity of dynamic retinoscopy in assessing the accommodative response
title_full The repeatability and validity of dynamic retinoscopy in assessing the accommodative response
title_fullStr The repeatability and validity of dynamic retinoscopy in assessing the accommodative response
title_full_unstemmed The repeatability and validity of dynamic retinoscopy in assessing the accommodative response
title_short The repeatability and validity of dynamic retinoscopy in assessing the accommodative response
title_sort the repeatability and validity of dynamic retinoscopy in assessing the accommodative response
title_unstemmed The repeatability and validity of dynamic retinoscopy in assessing the accommodative response
topic Sensory Systems, Optometry, Ophthalmology
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1046/j.1475-1313.2003.00113.x