author_facet Ijumba, J. N.
Mosha, F. W.
Lindsay, S. W.
Ijumba, J. N.
Mosha, F. W.
Lindsay, S. W.
author Ijumba, J. N.
Mosha, F. W.
Lindsay, S. W.
spellingShingle Ijumba, J. N.
Mosha, F. W.
Lindsay, S. W.
Medical and Veterinary Entomology
Malaria transmission risk variations derived from different agricultural practices in an irrigated area of northern Tanzania
Insect Science
General Veterinary
Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics
Parasitology
author_sort ijumba, j. n.
spelling Ijumba, J. N. Mosha, F. W. Lindsay, S. W. 0269-283X 1365-2915 Wiley Insect Science General Veterinary Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics Parasitology http://dx.doi.org/10.1046/j.0269-283x.2002.00337.x <jats:p><jats:bold>Abstract</jats:bold> Malaria vector <jats:italic>Anopheles</jats:italic> and other mosquitoes (Diptera: Culicidae) were monitored for 12 months during 1994–95 in villages of Lower Moshi irrigation area (37°20′ E, 3°21′ S; ∼700 m a.s.l.) south of Mount Kilimanjaro in northern Tanzania. Adult mosquito populations were sampled fortnightly by five methods: human bait collection indoors (18.00–06.00 hours) and outdoors (18.00–24.00 hours); from daytime resting‐sites indoors and outdoors; by CDC light‐traps over sleepers. <jats:italic>Anopheles</jats:italic> densities and rates of survival, anthropophily and malaria infection were compared between three villages representing different agro‐ecosystems: irrigated sugarcane plantation; smallholder rice irrigation scheme, and savannah with subsistence crops. Respective study villages were Mvuleni (population 2200), Chekereni (population 3200) and Kisangasangeni (population ?1000), at least 7 km apart.</jats:p><jats:p> <jats:italic>Anopheles arabiensis</jats:italic> Patton was found to be the principal malaria vector throughout the study area, with <jats:italic>An. funestus</jats:italic> Giles <jats:italic>sensu lato</jats:italic> of secondary importance in the sugarcane and savannah villages. Irrigated sugarcane cultivation resulted in water pooling, but this did not produce more vectors. <jats:italic>Anopheles arabiensis</jats:italic> densities averaged four‐fold higher in the ricefield village, although their human blood‐index was significantly less (48%) than in the sugarcane (68%) or savannah (66%) villages, despite similar proportions of humans and cows (ratio 1 : 1.1–1.4) as the main hosts at all sites. Parous rates, duration of the gonotrophic cycle and survival rates of <jats:italic>An. arabiensis</jats:italic> were similar in villages of all three agro‐ecosystems.</jats:p><jats:p>The potential risk of malaria, based on measurements of vectorial capacity of <jats:italic>An. arabiensis</jats:italic> and <jats:italic>An. funestus</jats:italic> combined, was four‐fold higher in the ricefield village than in the sugarcane or savannah villages nearby. However, the more realistic estimate of malaria risk, based on entomological inoculation rates, indicated that exposure to infective vectors was 61–68% less for people in the ricefield village, due to the much lower sporozoite rate in <jats:italic>An. arabiensis</jats:italic> (ricefield 0.01%, sugarcane 0.1%, savannah 0.12%). This contrast was attributed to better socio‐economic conditions of rice farmers, facilitating relatively more use of antimalarials and bednets for their families. Our findings show that, for a combination of reasons, the malaria challenge is lower for villagers associated with an irrigated rice‐growing scheme (despite greater malaria vector potential), than for adjacent communities with other agro‐ecosystems bringing less socio‐economic benefits to health. This encourages the development of agro‐irrigation schemes in African savannahs, provided that residents have ready access to antimalaria materials (i.e. effective antimalaria drugs and insecticidal bednets) that they may better afford for protection against the greater vectorial capacity of <jats:italic>An. arabiensis</jats:italic> from the ricefield agro‐ecosystem.</jats:p> Malaria transmission risk variations derived from different agricultural practices in an irrigated area of northern Tanzania Medical and Veterinary Entomology
doi_str_mv 10.1046/j.0269-283x.2002.00337.x
facet_avail Online
finc_class_facet Biologie
Geographie
Medizin
format ElectronicArticle
fullrecord blob:ai-49-aHR0cDovL2R4LmRvaS5vcmcvMTAuMTA0Ni9qLjAyNjktMjgzeC4yMDAyLjAwMzM3Lng
id ai-49-aHR0cDovL2R4LmRvaS5vcmcvMTAuMTA0Ni9qLjAyNjktMjgzeC4yMDAyLjAwMzM3Lng
institution DE-D275
DE-Bn3
DE-Brt1
DE-D161
DE-Gla1
DE-Zi4
DE-15
DE-Pl11
DE-Rs1
DE-105
DE-14
DE-Ch1
DE-L229
imprint Wiley, 2002
imprint_str_mv Wiley, 2002
issn 0269-283X
1365-2915
issn_str_mv 0269-283X
1365-2915
language English
mega_collection Wiley (CrossRef)
match_str ijumba2002malariatransmissionriskvariationsderivedfromdifferentagriculturalpracticesinanirrigatedareaofnortherntanzania
publishDateSort 2002
publisher Wiley
recordtype ai
record_format ai
series Medical and Veterinary Entomology
source_id 49
title Malaria transmission risk variations derived from different agricultural practices in an irrigated area of northern Tanzania
title_unstemmed Malaria transmission risk variations derived from different agricultural practices in an irrigated area of northern Tanzania
title_full Malaria transmission risk variations derived from different agricultural practices in an irrigated area of northern Tanzania
title_fullStr Malaria transmission risk variations derived from different agricultural practices in an irrigated area of northern Tanzania
title_full_unstemmed Malaria transmission risk variations derived from different agricultural practices in an irrigated area of northern Tanzania
title_short Malaria transmission risk variations derived from different agricultural practices in an irrigated area of northern Tanzania
title_sort malaria transmission risk variations derived from different agricultural practices in an irrigated area of northern tanzania
topic Insect Science
General Veterinary
Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics
Parasitology
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1046/j.0269-283x.2002.00337.x
publishDate 2002
physical 28-38
description <jats:p><jats:bold>Abstract</jats:bold> Malaria vector <jats:italic>Anopheles</jats:italic> and other mosquitoes (Diptera: Culicidae) were monitored for 12 months during 1994–95 in villages of Lower Moshi irrigation area (37°20′ E, 3°21′ S; ∼700 m a.s.l.) south of Mount Kilimanjaro in northern Tanzania. Adult mosquito populations were sampled fortnightly by five methods: human bait collection indoors (18.00–06.00 hours) and outdoors (18.00–24.00 hours); from daytime resting‐sites indoors and outdoors; by CDC light‐traps over sleepers. <jats:italic>Anopheles</jats:italic> densities and rates of survival, anthropophily and malaria infection were compared between three villages representing different agro‐ecosystems: irrigated sugarcane plantation; smallholder rice irrigation scheme, and savannah with subsistence crops. Respective study villages were Mvuleni (population 2200), Chekereni (population 3200) and Kisangasangeni (population ?1000), at least 7 km apart.</jats:p><jats:p> <jats:italic>Anopheles arabiensis</jats:italic> Patton was found to be the principal malaria vector throughout the study area, with <jats:italic>An. funestus</jats:italic> Giles <jats:italic>sensu lato</jats:italic> of secondary importance in the sugarcane and savannah villages. Irrigated sugarcane cultivation resulted in water pooling, but this did not produce more vectors. <jats:italic>Anopheles arabiensis</jats:italic> densities averaged four‐fold higher in the ricefield village, although their human blood‐index was significantly less (48%) than in the sugarcane (68%) or savannah (66%) villages, despite similar proportions of humans and cows (ratio 1 : 1.1–1.4) as the main hosts at all sites. Parous rates, duration of the gonotrophic cycle and survival rates of <jats:italic>An. arabiensis</jats:italic> were similar in villages of all three agro‐ecosystems.</jats:p><jats:p>The potential risk of malaria, based on measurements of vectorial capacity of <jats:italic>An. arabiensis</jats:italic> and <jats:italic>An. funestus</jats:italic> combined, was four‐fold higher in the ricefield village than in the sugarcane or savannah villages nearby. However, the more realistic estimate of malaria risk, based on entomological inoculation rates, indicated that exposure to infective vectors was 61–68% less for people in the ricefield village, due to the much lower sporozoite rate in <jats:italic>An. arabiensis</jats:italic> (ricefield 0.01%, sugarcane 0.1%, savannah 0.12%). This contrast was attributed to better socio‐economic conditions of rice farmers, facilitating relatively more use of antimalarials and bednets for their families. Our findings show that, for a combination of reasons, the malaria challenge is lower for villagers associated with an irrigated rice‐growing scheme (despite greater malaria vector potential), than for adjacent communities with other agro‐ecosystems bringing less socio‐economic benefits to health. This encourages the development of agro‐irrigation schemes in African savannahs, provided that residents have ready access to antimalaria materials (i.e. effective antimalaria drugs and insecticidal bednets) that they may better afford for protection against the greater vectorial capacity of <jats:italic>An. arabiensis</jats:italic> from the ricefield agro‐ecosystem.</jats:p>
container_issue 1
container_start_page 28
container_title Medical and Veterinary Entomology
container_volume 16
format_de105 Article, E-Article
format_de14 Article, E-Article
format_de15 Article, E-Article
format_de520 Article, E-Article
format_de540 Article, E-Article
format_dech1 Article, E-Article
format_ded117 Article, E-Article
format_degla1 E-Article
format_del152 Buch
format_del189 Article, E-Article
format_dezi4 Article
format_dezwi2 Article, E-Article
format_finc Article, E-Article
format_nrw Article, E-Article
_version_ 1792348380569010178
geogr_code not assigned
last_indexed 2024-03-01T18:10:15.436Z
geogr_code_person not assigned
openURL url_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fvufind.svn.sourceforge.net%3Agenerator&rft.title=Malaria+transmission+risk+variations+derived+from+different+agricultural+practices+in+an+irrigated+area+of+northern+Tanzania&rft.date=2002-03-01&genre=article&issn=1365-2915&volume=16&issue=1&spage=28&epage=38&pages=28-38&jtitle=Medical+and+Veterinary+Entomology&atitle=Malaria+transmission+risk+variations+derived+from+different+agricultural+practices+in+an+irrigated+area+of+northern+Tanzania&aulast=Lindsay&aufirst=S.+W.&rft_id=info%3Adoi%2F10.1046%2Fj.0269-283x.2002.00337.x&rft.language%5B0%5D=eng
SOLR
_version_ 1792348380569010178
author Ijumba, J. N., Mosha, F. W., Lindsay, S. W.
author_facet Ijumba, J. N., Mosha, F. W., Lindsay, S. W., Ijumba, J. N., Mosha, F. W., Lindsay, S. W.
author_sort ijumba, j. n.
container_issue 1
container_start_page 28
container_title Medical and Veterinary Entomology
container_volume 16
description <jats:p><jats:bold>Abstract</jats:bold> Malaria vector <jats:italic>Anopheles</jats:italic> and other mosquitoes (Diptera: Culicidae) were monitored for 12 months during 1994–95 in villages of Lower Moshi irrigation area (37°20′ E, 3°21′ S; ∼700 m a.s.l.) south of Mount Kilimanjaro in northern Tanzania. Adult mosquito populations were sampled fortnightly by five methods: human bait collection indoors (18.00–06.00 hours) and outdoors (18.00–24.00 hours); from daytime resting‐sites indoors and outdoors; by CDC light‐traps over sleepers. <jats:italic>Anopheles</jats:italic> densities and rates of survival, anthropophily and malaria infection were compared between three villages representing different agro‐ecosystems: irrigated sugarcane plantation; smallholder rice irrigation scheme, and savannah with subsistence crops. Respective study villages were Mvuleni (population 2200), Chekereni (population 3200) and Kisangasangeni (population ?1000), at least 7 km apart.</jats:p><jats:p> <jats:italic>Anopheles arabiensis</jats:italic> Patton was found to be the principal malaria vector throughout the study area, with <jats:italic>An. funestus</jats:italic> Giles <jats:italic>sensu lato</jats:italic> of secondary importance in the sugarcane and savannah villages. Irrigated sugarcane cultivation resulted in water pooling, but this did not produce more vectors. <jats:italic>Anopheles arabiensis</jats:italic> densities averaged four‐fold higher in the ricefield village, although their human blood‐index was significantly less (48%) than in the sugarcane (68%) or savannah (66%) villages, despite similar proportions of humans and cows (ratio 1 : 1.1–1.4) as the main hosts at all sites. Parous rates, duration of the gonotrophic cycle and survival rates of <jats:italic>An. arabiensis</jats:italic> were similar in villages of all three agro‐ecosystems.</jats:p><jats:p>The potential risk of malaria, based on measurements of vectorial capacity of <jats:italic>An. arabiensis</jats:italic> and <jats:italic>An. funestus</jats:italic> combined, was four‐fold higher in the ricefield village than in the sugarcane or savannah villages nearby. However, the more realistic estimate of malaria risk, based on entomological inoculation rates, indicated that exposure to infective vectors was 61–68% less for people in the ricefield village, due to the much lower sporozoite rate in <jats:italic>An. arabiensis</jats:italic> (ricefield 0.01%, sugarcane 0.1%, savannah 0.12%). This contrast was attributed to better socio‐economic conditions of rice farmers, facilitating relatively more use of antimalarials and bednets for their families. Our findings show that, for a combination of reasons, the malaria challenge is lower for villagers associated with an irrigated rice‐growing scheme (despite greater malaria vector potential), than for adjacent communities with other agro‐ecosystems bringing less socio‐economic benefits to health. This encourages the development of agro‐irrigation schemes in African savannahs, provided that residents have ready access to antimalaria materials (i.e. effective antimalaria drugs and insecticidal bednets) that they may better afford for protection against the greater vectorial capacity of <jats:italic>An. arabiensis</jats:italic> from the ricefield agro‐ecosystem.</jats:p>
doi_str_mv 10.1046/j.0269-283x.2002.00337.x
facet_avail Online
finc_class_facet Biologie, Geographie, Medizin
format ElectronicArticle
format_de105 Article, E-Article
format_de14 Article, E-Article
format_de15 Article, E-Article
format_de520 Article, E-Article
format_de540 Article, E-Article
format_dech1 Article, E-Article
format_ded117 Article, E-Article
format_degla1 E-Article
format_del152 Buch
format_del189 Article, E-Article
format_dezi4 Article
format_dezwi2 Article, E-Article
format_finc Article, E-Article
format_nrw Article, E-Article
geogr_code not assigned
geogr_code_person not assigned
id ai-49-aHR0cDovL2R4LmRvaS5vcmcvMTAuMTA0Ni9qLjAyNjktMjgzeC4yMDAyLjAwMzM3Lng
imprint Wiley, 2002
imprint_str_mv Wiley, 2002
institution DE-D275, DE-Bn3, DE-Brt1, DE-D161, DE-Gla1, DE-Zi4, DE-15, DE-Pl11, DE-Rs1, DE-105, DE-14, DE-Ch1, DE-L229
issn 0269-283X, 1365-2915
issn_str_mv 0269-283X, 1365-2915
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-01T18:10:15.436Z
match_str ijumba2002malariatransmissionriskvariationsderivedfromdifferentagriculturalpracticesinanirrigatedareaofnortherntanzania
mega_collection Wiley (CrossRef)
physical 28-38
publishDate 2002
publishDateSort 2002
publisher Wiley
record_format ai
recordtype ai
series Medical and Veterinary Entomology
source_id 49
spelling Ijumba, J. N. Mosha, F. W. Lindsay, S. W. 0269-283X 1365-2915 Wiley Insect Science General Veterinary Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics Parasitology http://dx.doi.org/10.1046/j.0269-283x.2002.00337.x <jats:p><jats:bold>Abstract</jats:bold> Malaria vector <jats:italic>Anopheles</jats:italic> and other mosquitoes (Diptera: Culicidae) were monitored for 12 months during 1994–95 in villages of Lower Moshi irrigation area (37°20′ E, 3°21′ S; ∼700 m a.s.l.) south of Mount Kilimanjaro in northern Tanzania. Adult mosquito populations were sampled fortnightly by five methods: human bait collection indoors (18.00–06.00 hours) and outdoors (18.00–24.00 hours); from daytime resting‐sites indoors and outdoors; by CDC light‐traps over sleepers. <jats:italic>Anopheles</jats:italic> densities and rates of survival, anthropophily and malaria infection were compared between three villages representing different agro‐ecosystems: irrigated sugarcane plantation; smallholder rice irrigation scheme, and savannah with subsistence crops. Respective study villages were Mvuleni (population 2200), Chekereni (population 3200) and Kisangasangeni (population ?1000), at least 7 km apart.</jats:p><jats:p> <jats:italic>Anopheles arabiensis</jats:italic> Patton was found to be the principal malaria vector throughout the study area, with <jats:italic>An. funestus</jats:italic> Giles <jats:italic>sensu lato</jats:italic> of secondary importance in the sugarcane and savannah villages. Irrigated sugarcane cultivation resulted in water pooling, but this did not produce more vectors. <jats:italic>Anopheles arabiensis</jats:italic> densities averaged four‐fold higher in the ricefield village, although their human blood‐index was significantly less (48%) than in the sugarcane (68%) or savannah (66%) villages, despite similar proportions of humans and cows (ratio 1 : 1.1–1.4) as the main hosts at all sites. Parous rates, duration of the gonotrophic cycle and survival rates of <jats:italic>An. arabiensis</jats:italic> were similar in villages of all three agro‐ecosystems.</jats:p><jats:p>The potential risk of malaria, based on measurements of vectorial capacity of <jats:italic>An. arabiensis</jats:italic> and <jats:italic>An. funestus</jats:italic> combined, was four‐fold higher in the ricefield village than in the sugarcane or savannah villages nearby. However, the more realistic estimate of malaria risk, based on entomological inoculation rates, indicated that exposure to infective vectors was 61–68% less for people in the ricefield village, due to the much lower sporozoite rate in <jats:italic>An. arabiensis</jats:italic> (ricefield 0.01%, sugarcane 0.1%, savannah 0.12%). This contrast was attributed to better socio‐economic conditions of rice farmers, facilitating relatively more use of antimalarials and bednets for their families. Our findings show that, for a combination of reasons, the malaria challenge is lower for villagers associated with an irrigated rice‐growing scheme (despite greater malaria vector potential), than for adjacent communities with other agro‐ecosystems bringing less socio‐economic benefits to health. This encourages the development of agro‐irrigation schemes in African savannahs, provided that residents have ready access to antimalaria materials (i.e. effective antimalaria drugs and insecticidal bednets) that they may better afford for protection against the greater vectorial capacity of <jats:italic>An. arabiensis</jats:italic> from the ricefield agro‐ecosystem.</jats:p> Malaria transmission risk variations derived from different agricultural practices in an irrigated area of northern Tanzania Medical and Veterinary Entomology
spellingShingle Ijumba, J. N., Mosha, F. W., Lindsay, S. W., Medical and Veterinary Entomology, Malaria transmission risk variations derived from different agricultural practices in an irrigated area of northern Tanzania, Insect Science, General Veterinary, Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics, Parasitology
title Malaria transmission risk variations derived from different agricultural practices in an irrigated area of northern Tanzania
title_full Malaria transmission risk variations derived from different agricultural practices in an irrigated area of northern Tanzania
title_fullStr Malaria transmission risk variations derived from different agricultural practices in an irrigated area of northern Tanzania
title_full_unstemmed Malaria transmission risk variations derived from different agricultural practices in an irrigated area of northern Tanzania
title_short Malaria transmission risk variations derived from different agricultural practices in an irrigated area of northern Tanzania
title_sort malaria transmission risk variations derived from different agricultural practices in an irrigated area of northern tanzania
title_unstemmed Malaria transmission risk variations derived from different agricultural practices in an irrigated area of northern Tanzania
topic Insect Science, General Veterinary, Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics, Parasitology
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1046/j.0269-283x.2002.00337.x