Eintrag weiter verarbeiten
Laboratory and field evaluation of insect repellents as oviposition deterrents against the mosquito Aedes albopictus
Gespeichert in:
| Zeitschriftentitel: | Medical and Veterinary Entomology |
|---|---|
| Personen und Körperschaften: | , , |
| In: | Medical and Veterinary Entomology, 15, 2001, 2, S. 126-131 |
| Format: | E-Article |
| Sprache: | Englisch |
| veröffentlicht: |
Wiley
|
| Schlagwörter: |
| author_facet |
Xue, R.‐D. Barnard, D. R. Ali, A. Xue, R.‐D. Barnard, D. R. Ali, A. |
|---|---|
| author |
Xue, R.‐D. Barnard, D. R. Ali, A. |
| spellingShingle |
Xue, R.‐D. Barnard, D. R. Ali, A. Medical and Veterinary Entomology Laboratory and field evaluation of insect repellents as oviposition deterrents against the mosquito Aedes albopictus Insect Science General Veterinary Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics Parasitology |
| author_sort |
xue, r.‐d. |
| spelling |
Xue, R.‐D. Barnard, D. R. Ali, A. 0269-283X 1365-2915 Wiley Insect Science General Veterinary Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics Parasitology http://dx.doi.org/10.1046/j.0269-283x.2001.00301.x <jats:p><jats:bold>Abstract.</jats:bold> Three experimental approaches were used to evaluate the oviposition deterrency of three insect repellents, AI3‐35765, AI3‐37220 (piperidine compounds), and the standard <jats:italic>N,N</jats:italic>‐diethyl‐3‐methylbenzamide (deet) to the mosquito <jats:italic>Aedes albopictus</jats:italic> Skuse (Diptera: Culicidae). Against laboratory‐reared <jats:italic>Ae</jats:italic>. <jats:italic>albopictus</jats:italic> gravid females, the EC<jats:sub>50</jats:sub> values of AI3‐37220, AI3‐35765 and deet were 0.004%, 0.008% and 0.011% in laboratory cages and 0.004%, 0.01% and 0.009% in an outdoor screened cage. For a natural population of <jats:italic>Ae. albopictus</jats:italic> tested in the field, the EC<jats:sub>50</jats:sub> values were determined as 0.004%, 0.008% and 0.001%, respectively. Ageing concentrations of 0.1% of each repellent provided > 50% effective oviposition deterrency against the laboratory population of <jats:italic>Ae. albopictus</jats:italic> for 13 days in laboratory cages, for 15 days in the outdoor cage, and for 21 days against field population of <jats:italic>Ae. albopictus</jats:italic> in Florida. These topical skin repellents are effective oviposition deterrents for <jats:italic>Ae. albopictus</jats:italic> when employed at relatively low application rates.</jats:p> Laboratory and field evaluation of insect repellents as oviposition deterrents against the mosquito <i>Aedes albopictus</i> Medical and Veterinary Entomology |
| doi_str_mv |
10.1046/j.0269-283x.2001.00301.x |
| facet_avail |
Online |
| finc_class_facet |
Biologie Geographie Medizin |
| format |
ElectronicArticle |
| fullrecord |
blob:ai-49-aHR0cDovL2R4LmRvaS5vcmcvMTAuMTA0Ni9qLjAyNjktMjgzeC4yMDAxLjAwMzAxLng |
| id |
ai-49-aHR0cDovL2R4LmRvaS5vcmcvMTAuMTA0Ni9qLjAyNjktMjgzeC4yMDAxLjAwMzAxLng |
| institution |
DE-15 DE-Rs1 DE-Pl11 DE-105 DE-14 DE-Ch1 DE-L229 DE-D275 DE-Bn3 DE-Brt1 DE-D161 DE-Gla1 DE-Zi4 |
| imprint |
Wiley, 2001 |
| imprint_str_mv |
Wiley, 2001 |
| issn |
0269-283X 1365-2915 |
| issn_str_mv |
0269-283X 1365-2915 |
| language |
English |
| mega_collection |
Wiley (CrossRef) |
| match_str |
xue2001laboratoryandfieldevaluationofinsectrepellentsasovipositiondeterrentsagainstthemosquitoaedesalbopictus |
| publishDateSort |
2001 |
| publisher |
Wiley |
| recordtype |
ai |
| record_format |
ai |
| series |
Medical and Veterinary Entomology |
| source_id |
49 |
| title |
Laboratory and field evaluation of insect repellents as oviposition deterrents against the mosquito Aedes albopictus |
| title_unstemmed |
Laboratory and field evaluation of insect repellents as oviposition deterrents against the mosquito Aedes albopictus |
| title_full |
Laboratory and field evaluation of insect repellents as oviposition deterrents against the mosquito Aedes albopictus |
| title_fullStr |
Laboratory and field evaluation of insect repellents as oviposition deterrents against the mosquito Aedes albopictus |
| title_full_unstemmed |
Laboratory and field evaluation of insect repellents as oviposition deterrents against the mosquito Aedes albopictus |
| title_short |
Laboratory and field evaluation of insect repellents as oviposition deterrents against the mosquito Aedes albopictus |
| title_sort |
laboratory and field evaluation of insect repellents as oviposition deterrents against the mosquito <i>aedes albopictus</i> |
| topic |
Insect Science General Veterinary Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics Parasitology |
| url |
http://dx.doi.org/10.1046/j.0269-283x.2001.00301.x |
| publishDate |
2001 |
| physical |
126-131 |
| description |
<jats:p><jats:bold>Abstract.</jats:bold> Three experimental approaches were used to evaluate the oviposition deterrency of three insect repellents, AI3‐35765, AI3‐37220 (piperidine compounds), and the standard <jats:italic>N,N</jats:italic>‐diethyl‐3‐methylbenzamide (deet) to the mosquito <jats:italic>Aedes albopictus</jats:italic> Skuse (Diptera: Culicidae). Against laboratory‐reared <jats:italic>Ae</jats:italic>. <jats:italic>albopictus</jats:italic> gravid females, the EC<jats:sub>50</jats:sub> values of AI3‐37220, AI3‐35765 and deet were 0.004%, 0.008% and 0.011% in laboratory cages and 0.004%, 0.01% and 0.009% in an outdoor screened cage. For a natural population of <jats:italic>Ae. albopictus</jats:italic> tested in the field, the EC<jats:sub>50</jats:sub> values were determined as 0.004%, 0.008% and 0.001%, respectively. Ageing concentrations of 0.1% of each repellent provided > 50% effective oviposition deterrency against the laboratory population of <jats:italic>Ae. albopictus</jats:italic> for 13 days in laboratory cages, for 15 days in the outdoor cage, and for 21 days against field population of <jats:italic>Ae. albopictus</jats:italic> in Florida. These topical skin repellents are effective oviposition deterrents for <jats:italic>Ae. albopictus</jats:italic> when employed at relatively low application rates.</jats:p> |
| container_issue |
2 |
| container_start_page |
126 |
| container_title |
Medical and Veterinary Entomology |
| container_volume |
15 |
| format_de105 |
Article, E-Article |
| format_de14 |
Article, E-Article |
| format_de15 |
Article, E-Article |
| format_de520 |
Article, E-Article |
| format_de540 |
Article, E-Article |
| format_dech1 |
Article, E-Article |
| format_ded117 |
Article, E-Article |
| format_degla1 |
E-Article |
| format_del152 |
Buch |
| format_del189 |
Article, E-Article |
| format_dezi4 |
Article |
| format_dezwi2 |
Article, E-Article |
| format_finc |
Article, E-Article |
| format_nrw |
Article, E-Article |
| _version_ |
1792348200652242945 |
| geogr_code |
not assigned |
| last_indexed |
2024-03-01T18:07:09.385Z |
| geogr_code_person |
not assigned |
| openURL |
url_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fvufind.svn.sourceforge.net%3Agenerator&rft.title=Laboratory+and+field+evaluation+of+insect+repellents+as+oviposition+deterrents+against+the+mosquito+Aedes+albopictus&rft.date=2001-06-01&genre=article&issn=1365-2915&volume=15&issue=2&spage=126&epage=131&pages=126-131&jtitle=Medical+and+Veterinary+Entomology&atitle=Laboratory+and+field+evaluation+of+insect+repellents+as+oviposition+deterrents+against+the+mosquito+%3Ci%3EAedes+albopictus%3C%2Fi%3E&aulast=Ali&aufirst=A.&rft_id=info%3Adoi%2F10.1046%2Fj.0269-283x.2001.00301.x&rft.language%5B0%5D=eng |
| SOLR | |
| _version_ | 1792348200652242945 |
| author | Xue, R.‐D., Barnard, D. R., Ali, A. |
| author_facet | Xue, R.‐D., Barnard, D. R., Ali, A., Xue, R.‐D., Barnard, D. R., Ali, A. |
| author_sort | xue, r.‐d. |
| container_issue | 2 |
| container_start_page | 126 |
| container_title | Medical and Veterinary Entomology |
| container_volume | 15 |
| description | <jats:p><jats:bold>Abstract.</jats:bold> Three experimental approaches were used to evaluate the oviposition deterrency of three insect repellents, AI3‐35765, AI3‐37220 (piperidine compounds), and the standard <jats:italic>N,N</jats:italic>‐diethyl‐3‐methylbenzamide (deet) to the mosquito <jats:italic>Aedes albopictus</jats:italic> Skuse (Diptera: Culicidae). Against laboratory‐reared <jats:italic>Ae</jats:italic>. <jats:italic>albopictus</jats:italic> gravid females, the EC<jats:sub>50</jats:sub> values of AI3‐37220, AI3‐35765 and deet were 0.004%, 0.008% and 0.011% in laboratory cages and 0.004%, 0.01% and 0.009% in an outdoor screened cage. For a natural population of <jats:italic>Ae. albopictus</jats:italic> tested in the field, the EC<jats:sub>50</jats:sub> values were determined as 0.004%, 0.008% and 0.001%, respectively. Ageing concentrations of 0.1% of each repellent provided > 50% effective oviposition deterrency against the laboratory population of <jats:italic>Ae. albopictus</jats:italic> for 13 days in laboratory cages, for 15 days in the outdoor cage, and for 21 days against field population of <jats:italic>Ae. albopictus</jats:italic> in Florida. These topical skin repellents are effective oviposition deterrents for <jats:italic>Ae. albopictus</jats:italic> when employed at relatively low application rates.</jats:p> |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1046/j.0269-283x.2001.00301.x |
| facet_avail | Online |
| finc_class_facet | Biologie, Geographie, Medizin |
| format | ElectronicArticle |
| format_de105 | Article, E-Article |
| format_de14 | Article, E-Article |
| format_de15 | Article, E-Article |
| format_de520 | Article, E-Article |
| format_de540 | Article, E-Article |
| format_dech1 | Article, E-Article |
| format_ded117 | Article, E-Article |
| format_degla1 | E-Article |
| format_del152 | Buch |
| format_del189 | Article, E-Article |
| format_dezi4 | Article |
| format_dezwi2 | Article, E-Article |
| format_finc | Article, E-Article |
| format_nrw | Article, E-Article |
| geogr_code | not assigned |
| geogr_code_person | not assigned |
| id | ai-49-aHR0cDovL2R4LmRvaS5vcmcvMTAuMTA0Ni9qLjAyNjktMjgzeC4yMDAxLjAwMzAxLng |
| imprint | Wiley, 2001 |
| imprint_str_mv | Wiley, 2001 |
| institution | DE-15, DE-Rs1, DE-Pl11, DE-105, DE-14, DE-Ch1, DE-L229, DE-D275, DE-Bn3, DE-Brt1, DE-D161, DE-Gla1, DE-Zi4 |
| issn | 0269-283X, 1365-2915 |
| issn_str_mv | 0269-283X, 1365-2915 |
| language | English |
| last_indexed | 2024-03-01T18:07:09.385Z |
| match_str | xue2001laboratoryandfieldevaluationofinsectrepellentsasovipositiondeterrentsagainstthemosquitoaedesalbopictus |
| mega_collection | Wiley (CrossRef) |
| physical | 126-131 |
| publishDate | 2001 |
| publishDateSort | 2001 |
| publisher | Wiley |
| record_format | ai |
| recordtype | ai |
| series | Medical and Veterinary Entomology |
| source_id | 49 |
| spelling | Xue, R.‐D. Barnard, D. R. Ali, A. 0269-283X 1365-2915 Wiley Insect Science General Veterinary Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics Parasitology http://dx.doi.org/10.1046/j.0269-283x.2001.00301.x <jats:p><jats:bold>Abstract.</jats:bold> Three experimental approaches were used to evaluate the oviposition deterrency of three insect repellents, AI3‐35765, AI3‐37220 (piperidine compounds), and the standard <jats:italic>N,N</jats:italic>‐diethyl‐3‐methylbenzamide (deet) to the mosquito <jats:italic>Aedes albopictus</jats:italic> Skuse (Diptera: Culicidae). Against laboratory‐reared <jats:italic>Ae</jats:italic>. <jats:italic>albopictus</jats:italic> gravid females, the EC<jats:sub>50</jats:sub> values of AI3‐37220, AI3‐35765 and deet were 0.004%, 0.008% and 0.011% in laboratory cages and 0.004%, 0.01% and 0.009% in an outdoor screened cage. For a natural population of <jats:italic>Ae. albopictus</jats:italic> tested in the field, the EC<jats:sub>50</jats:sub> values were determined as 0.004%, 0.008% and 0.001%, respectively. Ageing concentrations of 0.1% of each repellent provided > 50% effective oviposition deterrency against the laboratory population of <jats:italic>Ae. albopictus</jats:italic> for 13 days in laboratory cages, for 15 days in the outdoor cage, and for 21 days against field population of <jats:italic>Ae. albopictus</jats:italic> in Florida. These topical skin repellents are effective oviposition deterrents for <jats:italic>Ae. albopictus</jats:italic> when employed at relatively low application rates.</jats:p> Laboratory and field evaluation of insect repellents as oviposition deterrents against the mosquito <i>Aedes albopictus</i> Medical and Veterinary Entomology |
| spellingShingle | Xue, R.‐D., Barnard, D. R., Ali, A., Medical and Veterinary Entomology, Laboratory and field evaluation of insect repellents as oviposition deterrents against the mosquito Aedes albopictus, Insect Science, General Veterinary, Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics, Parasitology |
| title | Laboratory and field evaluation of insect repellents as oviposition deterrents against the mosquito Aedes albopictus |
| title_full | Laboratory and field evaluation of insect repellents as oviposition deterrents against the mosquito Aedes albopictus |
| title_fullStr | Laboratory and field evaluation of insect repellents as oviposition deterrents against the mosquito Aedes albopictus |
| title_full_unstemmed | Laboratory and field evaluation of insect repellents as oviposition deterrents against the mosquito Aedes albopictus |
| title_short | Laboratory and field evaluation of insect repellents as oviposition deterrents against the mosquito Aedes albopictus |
| title_sort | laboratory and field evaluation of insect repellents as oviposition deterrents against the mosquito <i>aedes albopictus</i> |
| title_unstemmed | Laboratory and field evaluation of insect repellents as oviposition deterrents against the mosquito Aedes albopictus |
| topic | Insect Science, General Veterinary, Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics, Parasitology |
| url | http://dx.doi.org/10.1046/j.0269-283x.2001.00301.x |