Eintrag weiter verarbeiten
Online-Ressource

Perceptual Characteristics of Consonant Production in Apraxia of Speech and Aphasia

Gespeichert in:

Bibliographische Detailangaben
Zeitschriftentitel: American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology
Personen und Körperschaften: Bislick, Lauren, Hula, William D.
In: American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology, 28, 2019, 4, S. 1411-1431
Format: E-Article
Sprache: Englisch
veröffentlicht:
American Speech Language Hearing Association
Schlagwörter:
Speech and Hearing
Linguistics and Language
Developmental and Educational Psychology
Otorhinolaryngology
author_facet Bislick, Lauren
Hula, William D.
Bislick, Lauren
Hula, William D.
author Bislick, Lauren
Hula, William D.
spellingShingle Bislick, Lauren
Hula, William D.
American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology
Perceptual Characteristics of Consonant Production in Apraxia of Speech and Aphasia
Speech and Hearing
Linguistics and Language
Developmental and Educational Psychology
Otorhinolaryngology
author_sort bislick, lauren
spelling Bislick, Lauren Hula, William D. 1058-0360 1558-9110 American Speech Language Hearing Association Speech and Hearing Linguistics and Language Developmental and Educational Psychology Otorhinolaryngology http://dx.doi.org/10.1044/2019_ajslp-18-0169 <jats:sec> <jats:title>Purpose</jats:title> <jats:p>This retrospective analysis examined group differences in error rate across 4 contextual variables (clusters vs. singletons, syllable position, number of syllables, and articulatory phonetic features) in adults with apraxia of speech (AOS) and adults with aphasia only. Group differences in the distribution of error type across contextual variables were also examined.</jats:p> </jats:sec> <jats:sec> <jats:title>Method</jats:title> <jats:p>Ten individuals with acquired AOS and aphasia and 11 individuals with aphasia participated in this study. In the context of a 2-group experimental design, the influence of 4 contextual variables on error rate and error type distribution was examined via repetition of 29 multisyllabic words. Error rates were analyzed using Bayesian methods, whereas distribution of error type was examined via descriptive statistics.</jats:p> </jats:sec> <jats:sec> <jats:title>Results</jats:title> <jats:p>There were 4 findings of robust differences between the 2 groups. These differences were found for syllable position, number of syllables, manner of articulation, and voicing. Group differences were less robust for clusters versus singletons and place of articulation. Results of error type distribution show a high proportion of distortion and substitution errors in speakers with AOS and a high proportion of substitution and omission errors in speakers with aphasia.</jats:p> </jats:sec> <jats:sec> <jats:title>Conclusion</jats:title> <jats:p>Findings add to the continued effort to improve the understanding and assessment of AOS and aphasia. Several contextual variables more consistently influenced breakdown in participants with AOS compared to participants with aphasia and should be considered during the diagnostic process.</jats:p> </jats:sec> <jats:sec> <jats:title>Supplemental Material</jats:title> <jats:p> <jats:ext-link xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.23641/asha.9701690">https://doi.org/10.23641/asha.9701690</jats:ext-link> </jats:p> </jats:sec> Perceptual Characteristics of Consonant Production in Apraxia of Speech and Aphasia American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology
doi_str_mv 10.1044/2019_ajslp-18-0169
facet_avail Online
finc_class_facet Medizin
Allgemeines
Allgemeine und vergleichende Sprach- und Literaturwissenschaft, Indogermanistik, Außereuropäische Sprachen und Literaturen
Biologie
Psychologie
format ElectronicArticle
fullrecord blob:ai-49-aHR0cDovL2R4LmRvaS5vcmcvMTAuMTA0NC8yMDE5X2Fqc2xwLTE4LTAxNjk
id ai-49-aHR0cDovL2R4LmRvaS5vcmcvMTAuMTA0NC8yMDE5X2Fqc2xwLTE4LTAxNjk
institution DE-Zi4
DE-Gla1
DE-15
DE-Pl11
DE-Rs1
DE-14
DE-Ch1
DE-L229
DE-D275
DE-Bn3
DE-Brt1
DE-D161
imprint American Speech Language Hearing Association, 2019
imprint_str_mv American Speech Language Hearing Association, 2019
issn 1058-0360
1558-9110
issn_str_mv 1058-0360
1558-9110
language English
mega_collection American Speech Language Hearing Association (CrossRef)
match_str bislick2019perceptualcharacteristicsofconsonantproductioninapraxiaofspeechandaphasia
publishDateSort 2019
publisher American Speech Language Hearing Association
recordtype ai
record_format ai
series American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology
source_id 49
title Perceptual Characteristics of Consonant Production in Apraxia of Speech and Aphasia
title_unstemmed Perceptual Characteristics of Consonant Production in Apraxia of Speech and Aphasia
title_full Perceptual Characteristics of Consonant Production in Apraxia of Speech and Aphasia
title_fullStr Perceptual Characteristics of Consonant Production in Apraxia of Speech and Aphasia
title_full_unstemmed Perceptual Characteristics of Consonant Production in Apraxia of Speech and Aphasia
title_short Perceptual Characteristics of Consonant Production in Apraxia of Speech and Aphasia
title_sort perceptual characteristics of consonant production in apraxia of speech and aphasia
topic Speech and Hearing
Linguistics and Language
Developmental and Educational Psychology
Otorhinolaryngology
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1044/2019_ajslp-18-0169
publishDate 2019
physical 1411-1431
description <jats:sec> <jats:title>Purpose</jats:title> <jats:p>This retrospective analysis examined group differences in error rate across 4 contextual variables (clusters vs. singletons, syllable position, number of syllables, and articulatory phonetic features) in adults with apraxia of speech (AOS) and adults with aphasia only. Group differences in the distribution of error type across contextual variables were also examined.</jats:p> </jats:sec> <jats:sec> <jats:title>Method</jats:title> <jats:p>Ten individuals with acquired AOS and aphasia and 11 individuals with aphasia participated in this study. In the context of a 2-group experimental design, the influence of 4 contextual variables on error rate and error type distribution was examined via repetition of 29 multisyllabic words. Error rates were analyzed using Bayesian methods, whereas distribution of error type was examined via descriptive statistics.</jats:p> </jats:sec> <jats:sec> <jats:title>Results</jats:title> <jats:p>There were 4 findings of robust differences between the 2 groups. These differences were found for syllable position, number of syllables, manner of articulation, and voicing. Group differences were less robust for clusters versus singletons and place of articulation. Results of error type distribution show a high proportion of distortion and substitution errors in speakers with AOS and a high proportion of substitution and omission errors in speakers with aphasia.</jats:p> </jats:sec> <jats:sec> <jats:title>Conclusion</jats:title> <jats:p>Findings add to the continued effort to improve the understanding and assessment of AOS and aphasia. Several contextual variables more consistently influenced breakdown in participants with AOS compared to participants with aphasia and should be considered during the diagnostic process.</jats:p> </jats:sec> <jats:sec> <jats:title>Supplemental Material</jats:title> <jats:p> <jats:ext-link xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.23641/asha.9701690">https://doi.org/10.23641/asha.9701690</jats:ext-link> </jats:p> </jats:sec>
container_issue 4
container_start_page 1411
container_title American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology
container_volume 28
format_de105 Article, E-Article
format_de14 Article, E-Article
format_de15 Article, E-Article
format_de520 Article, E-Article
format_de540 Article, E-Article
format_dech1 Article, E-Article
format_ded117 Article, E-Article
format_degla1 E-Article
format_del152 Buch
format_del189 Article, E-Article
format_dezi4 Article
format_dezwi2 Article, E-Article
format_finc Article, E-Article
format_nrw Article, E-Article
_version_ 1792336078107049987
geogr_code not assigned
last_indexed 2024-03-01T14:54:32.048Z
geogr_code_person not assigned
openURL url_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fvufind.svn.sourceforge.net%3Agenerator&rft.title=Perceptual+Characteristics+of+Consonant+Production+in+Apraxia+of+Speech+and+Aphasia&rft.date=2019-11-19&genre=article&issn=1558-9110&volume=28&issue=4&spage=1411&epage=1431&pages=1411-1431&jtitle=American+Journal+of+Speech-Language+Pathology&atitle=Perceptual+Characteristics+of+Consonant+Production+in+Apraxia+of+Speech+and+Aphasia&aulast=Hula&aufirst=William+D.&rft_id=info%3Adoi%2F10.1044%2F2019_ajslp-18-0169&rft.language%5B0%5D=eng
SOLR
_version_ 1792336078107049987
author Bislick, Lauren, Hula, William D.
author_facet Bislick, Lauren, Hula, William D., Bislick, Lauren, Hula, William D.
author_sort bislick, lauren
container_issue 4
container_start_page 1411
container_title American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology
container_volume 28
description <jats:sec> <jats:title>Purpose</jats:title> <jats:p>This retrospective analysis examined group differences in error rate across 4 contextual variables (clusters vs. singletons, syllable position, number of syllables, and articulatory phonetic features) in adults with apraxia of speech (AOS) and adults with aphasia only. Group differences in the distribution of error type across contextual variables were also examined.</jats:p> </jats:sec> <jats:sec> <jats:title>Method</jats:title> <jats:p>Ten individuals with acquired AOS and aphasia and 11 individuals with aphasia participated in this study. In the context of a 2-group experimental design, the influence of 4 contextual variables on error rate and error type distribution was examined via repetition of 29 multisyllabic words. Error rates were analyzed using Bayesian methods, whereas distribution of error type was examined via descriptive statistics.</jats:p> </jats:sec> <jats:sec> <jats:title>Results</jats:title> <jats:p>There were 4 findings of robust differences between the 2 groups. These differences were found for syllable position, number of syllables, manner of articulation, and voicing. Group differences were less robust for clusters versus singletons and place of articulation. Results of error type distribution show a high proportion of distortion and substitution errors in speakers with AOS and a high proportion of substitution and omission errors in speakers with aphasia.</jats:p> </jats:sec> <jats:sec> <jats:title>Conclusion</jats:title> <jats:p>Findings add to the continued effort to improve the understanding and assessment of AOS and aphasia. Several contextual variables more consistently influenced breakdown in participants with AOS compared to participants with aphasia and should be considered during the diagnostic process.</jats:p> </jats:sec> <jats:sec> <jats:title>Supplemental Material</jats:title> <jats:p> <jats:ext-link xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.23641/asha.9701690">https://doi.org/10.23641/asha.9701690</jats:ext-link> </jats:p> </jats:sec>
doi_str_mv 10.1044/2019_ajslp-18-0169
facet_avail Online
finc_class_facet Medizin, Allgemeines, Allgemeine und vergleichende Sprach- und Literaturwissenschaft, Indogermanistik, Außereuropäische Sprachen und Literaturen, Biologie, Psychologie
format ElectronicArticle
format_de105 Article, E-Article
format_de14 Article, E-Article
format_de15 Article, E-Article
format_de520 Article, E-Article
format_de540 Article, E-Article
format_dech1 Article, E-Article
format_ded117 Article, E-Article
format_degla1 E-Article
format_del152 Buch
format_del189 Article, E-Article
format_dezi4 Article
format_dezwi2 Article, E-Article
format_finc Article, E-Article
format_nrw Article, E-Article
geogr_code not assigned
geogr_code_person not assigned
id ai-49-aHR0cDovL2R4LmRvaS5vcmcvMTAuMTA0NC8yMDE5X2Fqc2xwLTE4LTAxNjk
imprint American Speech Language Hearing Association, 2019
imprint_str_mv American Speech Language Hearing Association, 2019
institution DE-Zi4, DE-Gla1, DE-15, DE-Pl11, DE-Rs1, DE-14, DE-Ch1, DE-L229, DE-D275, DE-Bn3, DE-Brt1, DE-D161
issn 1058-0360, 1558-9110
issn_str_mv 1058-0360, 1558-9110
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-01T14:54:32.048Z
match_str bislick2019perceptualcharacteristicsofconsonantproductioninapraxiaofspeechandaphasia
mega_collection American Speech Language Hearing Association (CrossRef)
physical 1411-1431
publishDate 2019
publishDateSort 2019
publisher American Speech Language Hearing Association
record_format ai
recordtype ai
series American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology
source_id 49
spelling Bislick, Lauren Hula, William D. 1058-0360 1558-9110 American Speech Language Hearing Association Speech and Hearing Linguistics and Language Developmental and Educational Psychology Otorhinolaryngology http://dx.doi.org/10.1044/2019_ajslp-18-0169 <jats:sec> <jats:title>Purpose</jats:title> <jats:p>This retrospective analysis examined group differences in error rate across 4 contextual variables (clusters vs. singletons, syllable position, number of syllables, and articulatory phonetic features) in adults with apraxia of speech (AOS) and adults with aphasia only. Group differences in the distribution of error type across contextual variables were also examined.</jats:p> </jats:sec> <jats:sec> <jats:title>Method</jats:title> <jats:p>Ten individuals with acquired AOS and aphasia and 11 individuals with aphasia participated in this study. In the context of a 2-group experimental design, the influence of 4 contextual variables on error rate and error type distribution was examined via repetition of 29 multisyllabic words. Error rates were analyzed using Bayesian methods, whereas distribution of error type was examined via descriptive statistics.</jats:p> </jats:sec> <jats:sec> <jats:title>Results</jats:title> <jats:p>There were 4 findings of robust differences between the 2 groups. These differences were found for syllable position, number of syllables, manner of articulation, and voicing. Group differences were less robust for clusters versus singletons and place of articulation. Results of error type distribution show a high proportion of distortion and substitution errors in speakers with AOS and a high proportion of substitution and omission errors in speakers with aphasia.</jats:p> </jats:sec> <jats:sec> <jats:title>Conclusion</jats:title> <jats:p>Findings add to the continued effort to improve the understanding and assessment of AOS and aphasia. Several contextual variables more consistently influenced breakdown in participants with AOS compared to participants with aphasia and should be considered during the diagnostic process.</jats:p> </jats:sec> <jats:sec> <jats:title>Supplemental Material</jats:title> <jats:p> <jats:ext-link xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.23641/asha.9701690">https://doi.org/10.23641/asha.9701690</jats:ext-link> </jats:p> </jats:sec> Perceptual Characteristics of Consonant Production in Apraxia of Speech and Aphasia American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology
spellingShingle Bislick, Lauren, Hula, William D., American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology, Perceptual Characteristics of Consonant Production in Apraxia of Speech and Aphasia, Speech and Hearing, Linguistics and Language, Developmental and Educational Psychology, Otorhinolaryngology
title Perceptual Characteristics of Consonant Production in Apraxia of Speech and Aphasia
title_full Perceptual Characteristics of Consonant Production in Apraxia of Speech and Aphasia
title_fullStr Perceptual Characteristics of Consonant Production in Apraxia of Speech and Aphasia
title_full_unstemmed Perceptual Characteristics of Consonant Production in Apraxia of Speech and Aphasia
title_short Perceptual Characteristics of Consonant Production in Apraxia of Speech and Aphasia
title_sort perceptual characteristics of consonant production in apraxia of speech and aphasia
title_unstemmed Perceptual Characteristics of Consonant Production in Apraxia of Speech and Aphasia
topic Speech and Hearing, Linguistics and Language, Developmental and Educational Psychology, Otorhinolaryngology
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1044/2019_ajslp-18-0169