Eintrag weiter verarbeiten
Intentional and Reactive Inhibition During Spoken-Word Stroop Task Performance in People With Aphasia
Gespeichert in:
| Zeitschriftentitel: | Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research |
|---|---|
| Personen und Körperschaften: | , , , |
| In: | Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 58, 2015, 3, S. 767-780 |
| Format: | E-Article |
| Sprache: | Englisch |
| veröffentlicht: |
American Speech Language Hearing Association
|
| Schlagwörter: |
| author_facet |
Pompon, Rebecca Hunting McNeil, Malcolm R. Spencer, Kristie A. Kendall, Diane L. Pompon, Rebecca Hunting McNeil, Malcolm R. Spencer, Kristie A. Kendall, Diane L. |
|---|---|
| author |
Pompon, Rebecca Hunting McNeil, Malcolm R. Spencer, Kristie A. Kendall, Diane L. |
| spellingShingle |
Pompon, Rebecca Hunting McNeil, Malcolm R. Spencer, Kristie A. Kendall, Diane L. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research Intentional and Reactive Inhibition During Spoken-Word Stroop Task Performance in People With Aphasia Speech and Hearing Linguistics and Language Language and Linguistics |
| author_sort |
pompon, rebecca hunting |
| spelling |
Pompon, Rebecca Hunting McNeil, Malcolm R. Spencer, Kristie A. Kendall, Diane L. 1092-4388 1558-9102 American Speech Language Hearing Association Speech and Hearing Linguistics and Language Language and Linguistics http://dx.doi.org/10.1044/2015_jslhr-l-14-0063 <jats:sec> <jats:title>Purpose</jats:title> <jats:p>The integrity of selective attention in people with aphasia (PWA) is currently unknown. Selective attention is essential for everyday communication, and inhibition is an important part of selective attention. This study explored components of inhibition—both intentional and reactive inhibition—during spoken-word production in PWA and in controls who were neurologically healthy (HC). Intentional inhibition is the ability to suppress a response to interference, and reactive inhibition is the delayed reactivation of a previously suppressed item.</jats:p> </jats:sec> <jats:sec> <jats:title>Method</jats:title> <jats:p>Nineteen PWA and 20 age- and education-matched HC participated in a Stroop spoken-word production task. This task allowed the examination of intentional and reactive inhibition by evoking and comparing interference, facilitation, and negative priming effects in different contexts.</jats:p> </jats:sec> <jats:sec> <jats:title>Results</jats:title> <jats:p>Although both groups demonstrated intentional inhibition, PWA demonstrated significantly more interference effects. PWA demonstrated no significant facilitation effects. HC demonstrated significant reverse facilitation effects. Neither group showed significant evidence of reactive inhibition, though both groups showed similar individual variability.</jats:p> </jats:sec> <jats:sec> <jats:title>Conclusions</jats:title> <jats:p>These results underscore the challenge interference presents for PWA during spoken-word production, indicating diminished intentional inhibition. Although reactive inhibition was not different between PWA and HC, PWA showed difficulty integrating and adapting to contextual information during language tasks.</jats:p> </jats:sec> Intentional and Reactive Inhibition During Spoken-Word Stroop Task Performance in People With Aphasia Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research |
| doi_str_mv |
10.1044/2015_jslhr-l-14-0063 |
| facet_avail |
Online |
| finc_class_facet |
Allgemeines Allgemeine und vergleichende Sprach- und Literaturwissenschaft, Indogermanistik, Außereuropäische Sprachen und Literaturen |
| format |
ElectronicArticle |
| fullrecord |
blob:ai-49-aHR0cDovL2R4LmRvaS5vcmcvMTAuMTA0NC8yMDE1X2pzbGhyLWwtMTQtMDA2Mw |
| id |
ai-49-aHR0cDovL2R4LmRvaS5vcmcvMTAuMTA0NC8yMDE1X2pzbGhyLWwtMTQtMDA2Mw |
| institution |
DE-Gla1 DE-Zi4 DE-15 FID-MEDIEN-DE-15 DE-Pl11 DE-Rs1 DE-14 DE-Ch1 DE-L229 DE-D275 DE-Bn3 DE-Brt1 DE-D161 |
| imprint |
American Speech Language Hearing Association, 2015 |
| imprint_str_mv |
American Speech Language Hearing Association, 2015 |
| issn |
1092-4388 1558-9102 |
| issn_str_mv |
1092-4388 1558-9102 |
| language |
English |
| mega_collection |
American Speech Language Hearing Association (CrossRef) |
| match_str |
pompon2015intentionalandreactiveinhibitionduringspokenwordstrooptaskperformanceinpeoplewithaphasia |
| publishDateSort |
2015 |
| publisher |
American Speech Language Hearing Association |
| recordtype |
ai |
| record_format |
ai |
| series |
Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research |
| source_id |
49 |
| title |
Intentional and Reactive Inhibition During Spoken-Word Stroop Task Performance in People With Aphasia |
| title_unstemmed |
Intentional and Reactive Inhibition During Spoken-Word Stroop Task Performance in People With Aphasia |
| title_full |
Intentional and Reactive Inhibition During Spoken-Word Stroop Task Performance in People With Aphasia |
| title_fullStr |
Intentional and Reactive Inhibition During Spoken-Word Stroop Task Performance in People With Aphasia |
| title_full_unstemmed |
Intentional and Reactive Inhibition During Spoken-Word Stroop Task Performance in People With Aphasia |
| title_short |
Intentional and Reactive Inhibition During Spoken-Word Stroop Task Performance in People With Aphasia |
| title_sort |
intentional and reactive inhibition during spoken-word stroop task performance in people with aphasia |
| topic |
Speech and Hearing Linguistics and Language Language and Linguistics |
| url |
http://dx.doi.org/10.1044/2015_jslhr-l-14-0063 |
| publishDate |
2015 |
| physical |
767-780 |
| description |
<jats:sec>
<jats:title>Purpose</jats:title>
<jats:p>The integrity of selective attention in people with aphasia (PWA) is currently unknown. Selective attention is essential for everyday communication, and inhibition is an important part of selective attention. This study explored components of inhibition—both intentional and reactive inhibition—during spoken-word production in PWA and in controls who were neurologically healthy (HC). Intentional inhibition is the ability to suppress a response to interference, and reactive inhibition is the delayed reactivation of a previously suppressed item.</jats:p>
</jats:sec>
<jats:sec>
<jats:title>Method</jats:title>
<jats:p>Nineteen PWA and 20 age- and education-matched HC participated in a Stroop spoken-word production task. This task allowed the examination of intentional and reactive inhibition by evoking and comparing interference, facilitation, and negative priming effects in different contexts.</jats:p>
</jats:sec>
<jats:sec>
<jats:title>Results</jats:title>
<jats:p>Although both groups demonstrated intentional inhibition, PWA demonstrated significantly more interference effects. PWA demonstrated no significant facilitation effects. HC demonstrated significant reverse facilitation effects. Neither group showed significant evidence of reactive inhibition, though both groups showed similar individual variability.</jats:p>
</jats:sec>
<jats:sec>
<jats:title>Conclusions</jats:title>
<jats:p>These results underscore the challenge interference presents for PWA during spoken-word production, indicating diminished intentional inhibition. Although reactive inhibition was not different between PWA and HC, PWA showed difficulty integrating and adapting to contextual information during language tasks.</jats:p>
</jats:sec> |
| container_issue |
3 |
| container_start_page |
767 |
| container_title |
Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research |
| container_volume |
58 |
| format_de105 |
Article, E-Article |
| format_de14 |
Article, E-Article |
| format_de15 |
Article, E-Article |
| format_de520 |
Article, E-Article |
| format_de540 |
Article, E-Article |
| format_dech1 |
Article, E-Article |
| format_ded117 |
Article, E-Article |
| format_degla1 |
E-Article |
| format_del152 |
Buch |
| format_del189 |
Article, E-Article |
| format_dezi4 |
Article |
| format_dezwi2 |
Article, E-Article |
| format_finc |
Article, E-Article |
| format_nrw |
Article, E-Article |
| _version_ |
1792341514844635139 |
| geogr_code |
not assigned |
| last_indexed |
2024-03-01T16:21:08.734Z |
| geogr_code_person |
not assigned |
| openURL |
url_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fvufind.svn.sourceforge.net%3Agenerator&rft.title=Intentional+and+Reactive+Inhibition+During+Spoken-Word+Stroop+Task+Performance+in+People+With+Aphasia&rft.date=2015-06-01&genre=article&issn=1558-9102&volume=58&issue=3&spage=767&epage=780&pages=767-780&jtitle=Journal+of+Speech%2C+Language%2C+and+Hearing+Research&atitle=Intentional+and+Reactive+Inhibition+During+Spoken-Word+Stroop+Task+Performance+in+People+With+Aphasia&aulast=Kendall&aufirst=Diane+L.&rft_id=info%3Adoi%2F10.1044%2F2015_jslhr-l-14-0063&rft.language%5B0%5D=eng |
| SOLR | |
| _version_ | 1792341514844635139 |
| author | Pompon, Rebecca Hunting, McNeil, Malcolm R., Spencer, Kristie A., Kendall, Diane L. |
| author_facet | Pompon, Rebecca Hunting, McNeil, Malcolm R., Spencer, Kristie A., Kendall, Diane L., Pompon, Rebecca Hunting, McNeil, Malcolm R., Spencer, Kristie A., Kendall, Diane L. |
| author_sort | pompon, rebecca hunting |
| container_issue | 3 |
| container_start_page | 767 |
| container_title | Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research |
| container_volume | 58 |
| description | <jats:sec> <jats:title>Purpose</jats:title> <jats:p>The integrity of selective attention in people with aphasia (PWA) is currently unknown. Selective attention is essential for everyday communication, and inhibition is an important part of selective attention. This study explored components of inhibition—both intentional and reactive inhibition—during spoken-word production in PWA and in controls who were neurologically healthy (HC). Intentional inhibition is the ability to suppress a response to interference, and reactive inhibition is the delayed reactivation of a previously suppressed item.</jats:p> </jats:sec> <jats:sec> <jats:title>Method</jats:title> <jats:p>Nineteen PWA and 20 age- and education-matched HC participated in a Stroop spoken-word production task. This task allowed the examination of intentional and reactive inhibition by evoking and comparing interference, facilitation, and negative priming effects in different contexts.</jats:p> </jats:sec> <jats:sec> <jats:title>Results</jats:title> <jats:p>Although both groups demonstrated intentional inhibition, PWA demonstrated significantly more interference effects. PWA demonstrated no significant facilitation effects. HC demonstrated significant reverse facilitation effects. Neither group showed significant evidence of reactive inhibition, though both groups showed similar individual variability.</jats:p> </jats:sec> <jats:sec> <jats:title>Conclusions</jats:title> <jats:p>These results underscore the challenge interference presents for PWA during spoken-word production, indicating diminished intentional inhibition. Although reactive inhibition was not different between PWA and HC, PWA showed difficulty integrating and adapting to contextual information during language tasks.</jats:p> </jats:sec> |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1044/2015_jslhr-l-14-0063 |
| facet_avail | Online |
| finc_class_facet | Allgemeines, Allgemeine und vergleichende Sprach- und Literaturwissenschaft, Indogermanistik, Außereuropäische Sprachen und Literaturen |
| format | ElectronicArticle |
| format_de105 | Article, E-Article |
| format_de14 | Article, E-Article |
| format_de15 | Article, E-Article |
| format_de520 | Article, E-Article |
| format_de540 | Article, E-Article |
| format_dech1 | Article, E-Article |
| format_ded117 | Article, E-Article |
| format_degla1 | E-Article |
| format_del152 | Buch |
| format_del189 | Article, E-Article |
| format_dezi4 | Article |
| format_dezwi2 | Article, E-Article |
| format_finc | Article, E-Article |
| format_nrw | Article, E-Article |
| geogr_code | not assigned |
| geogr_code_person | not assigned |
| id | ai-49-aHR0cDovL2R4LmRvaS5vcmcvMTAuMTA0NC8yMDE1X2pzbGhyLWwtMTQtMDA2Mw |
| imprint | American Speech Language Hearing Association, 2015 |
| imprint_str_mv | American Speech Language Hearing Association, 2015 |
| institution | DE-Gla1, DE-Zi4, DE-15, FID-MEDIEN-DE-15, DE-Pl11, DE-Rs1, DE-14, DE-Ch1, DE-L229, DE-D275, DE-Bn3, DE-Brt1, DE-D161 |
| issn | 1092-4388, 1558-9102 |
| issn_str_mv | 1092-4388, 1558-9102 |
| language | English |
| last_indexed | 2024-03-01T16:21:08.734Z |
| match_str | pompon2015intentionalandreactiveinhibitionduringspokenwordstrooptaskperformanceinpeoplewithaphasia |
| mega_collection | American Speech Language Hearing Association (CrossRef) |
| physical | 767-780 |
| publishDate | 2015 |
| publishDateSort | 2015 |
| publisher | American Speech Language Hearing Association |
| record_format | ai |
| recordtype | ai |
| series | Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research |
| source_id | 49 |
| spelling | Pompon, Rebecca Hunting McNeil, Malcolm R. Spencer, Kristie A. Kendall, Diane L. 1092-4388 1558-9102 American Speech Language Hearing Association Speech and Hearing Linguistics and Language Language and Linguistics http://dx.doi.org/10.1044/2015_jslhr-l-14-0063 <jats:sec> <jats:title>Purpose</jats:title> <jats:p>The integrity of selective attention in people with aphasia (PWA) is currently unknown. Selective attention is essential for everyday communication, and inhibition is an important part of selective attention. This study explored components of inhibition—both intentional and reactive inhibition—during spoken-word production in PWA and in controls who were neurologically healthy (HC). Intentional inhibition is the ability to suppress a response to interference, and reactive inhibition is the delayed reactivation of a previously suppressed item.</jats:p> </jats:sec> <jats:sec> <jats:title>Method</jats:title> <jats:p>Nineteen PWA and 20 age- and education-matched HC participated in a Stroop spoken-word production task. This task allowed the examination of intentional and reactive inhibition by evoking and comparing interference, facilitation, and negative priming effects in different contexts.</jats:p> </jats:sec> <jats:sec> <jats:title>Results</jats:title> <jats:p>Although both groups demonstrated intentional inhibition, PWA demonstrated significantly more interference effects. PWA demonstrated no significant facilitation effects. HC demonstrated significant reverse facilitation effects. Neither group showed significant evidence of reactive inhibition, though both groups showed similar individual variability.</jats:p> </jats:sec> <jats:sec> <jats:title>Conclusions</jats:title> <jats:p>These results underscore the challenge interference presents for PWA during spoken-word production, indicating diminished intentional inhibition. Although reactive inhibition was not different between PWA and HC, PWA showed difficulty integrating and adapting to contextual information during language tasks.</jats:p> </jats:sec> Intentional and Reactive Inhibition During Spoken-Word Stroop Task Performance in People With Aphasia Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research |
| spellingShingle | Pompon, Rebecca Hunting, McNeil, Malcolm R., Spencer, Kristie A., Kendall, Diane L., Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, Intentional and Reactive Inhibition During Spoken-Word Stroop Task Performance in People With Aphasia, Speech and Hearing, Linguistics and Language, Language and Linguistics |
| title | Intentional and Reactive Inhibition During Spoken-Word Stroop Task Performance in People With Aphasia |
| title_full | Intentional and Reactive Inhibition During Spoken-Word Stroop Task Performance in People With Aphasia |
| title_fullStr | Intentional and Reactive Inhibition During Spoken-Word Stroop Task Performance in People With Aphasia |
| title_full_unstemmed | Intentional and Reactive Inhibition During Spoken-Word Stroop Task Performance in People With Aphasia |
| title_short | Intentional and Reactive Inhibition During Spoken-Word Stroop Task Performance in People With Aphasia |
| title_sort | intentional and reactive inhibition during spoken-word stroop task performance in people with aphasia |
| title_unstemmed | Intentional and Reactive Inhibition During Spoken-Word Stroop Task Performance in People With Aphasia |
| topic | Speech and Hearing, Linguistics and Language, Language and Linguistics |
| url | http://dx.doi.org/10.1044/2015_jslhr-l-14-0063 |