author_facet Harasymiuk, Jolanta
Hanna Szafranko, Elżbieta
Tyburski, Jan
Harasymiuk, Jolanta
Hanna Szafranko, Elżbieta
Tyburski, Jan
author Harasymiuk, Jolanta
Hanna Szafranko, Elżbieta
Tyburski, Jan
spellingShingle Harasymiuk, Jolanta
Hanna Szafranko, Elżbieta
Tyburski, Jan
Open Engineering
Methods of habitat reports’ evaluation
Electrical and Electronic Engineering
Mechanical Engineering
Aerospace Engineering
General Materials Science
Civil and Structural Engineering
Environmental Engineering
author_sort harasymiuk, jolanta
spelling Harasymiuk, Jolanta Hanna Szafranko, Elżbieta Tyburski, Jan 2391-5439 Walter de Gruyter GmbH Electrical and Electronic Engineering Mechanical Engineering Aerospace Engineering General Materials Science Civil and Structural Engineering Environmental Engineering http://dx.doi.org/10.1515/eng-2019-0001 <jats:title>Abstract</jats:title> <jats:p>A building investment, especially in nature valuable areas, is almost always inseparable with a bigger or smaller environmental interference. For a few years there are legal regulations created to protect these areas. One of them is the requirement to conduct a habitat evaluation and to prepare a habitat report if there is a indication of significant impact on the Natura 200 site. The quality of such a report is crucial for completion an investment in a chosen localisation as well as for shortening a preparation stage with respect to environmental requirements. A defective report can result in a agreement refusal of investment completion conditions of an investment by an authorised body, and can be a reason for protests of a community which is affected by the planned investment. A well-made report, on the other hand, results in a smooth acceptance of the project without the need for consultation of the investor with the proceeding body and saving the cost of correction of a defective documentation. An review of the literature done by the authors and the talks carried out with the staff making an assessment of reports of an impact on Natura 2000 sites showed the lack of common use in practise of a formalised set of criteria of evaluation of such documents. The aim of the study was to prepare a set of evaluation criteria for reports on environmental impact on Natura 2000 sites. The set was tested on already made reports and it showed their basic omissions and disparities. The set prepared can be used by an investor in the course of making a report. It can be also a useful tool for a verifying clerk while evaluating a report for its completeness and adequacy. On the basis of the prepared set of evaluation criteria, a procedure was proposed allowing an impartial verification of reports. As a result of analyses made, a procedure was worked out which is presented in the diagram concluding this paper.</jats:p> Methods of habitat reports’ evaluation Open Engineering
doi_str_mv 10.1515/eng-2019-0001
facet_avail Online
Free
finc_class_facet Biologie
Technik
Mathematik
Physik
Geographie
format ElectronicArticle
fullrecord blob:ai-49-aHR0cDovL2R4LmRvaS5vcmcvMTAuMTUxNS9lbmctMjAxOS0wMDAx
id ai-49-aHR0cDovL2R4LmRvaS5vcmcvMTAuMTUxNS9lbmctMjAxOS0wMDAx
institution DE-Gla1
DE-Zi4
DE-15
DE-Rs1
DE-Pl11
DE-105
DE-14
DE-Ch1
DE-L229
DE-D275
DE-Bn3
DE-Brt1
DE-Zwi2
DE-D161
imprint Walter de Gruyter GmbH, 2019
imprint_str_mv Walter de Gruyter GmbH, 2019
issn 2391-5439
issn_str_mv 2391-5439
language English
mega_collection Walter de Gruyter GmbH (CrossRef)
match_str harasymiuk2019methodsofhabitatreportsevaluation
publishDateSort 2019
publisher Walter de Gruyter GmbH
recordtype ai
record_format ai
series Open Engineering
source_id 49
title Methods of habitat reports’ evaluation
title_unstemmed Methods of habitat reports’ evaluation
title_full Methods of habitat reports’ evaluation
title_fullStr Methods of habitat reports’ evaluation
title_full_unstemmed Methods of habitat reports’ evaluation
title_short Methods of habitat reports’ evaluation
title_sort methods of habitat reports’ evaluation
topic Electrical and Electronic Engineering
Mechanical Engineering
Aerospace Engineering
General Materials Science
Civil and Structural Engineering
Environmental Engineering
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1515/eng-2019-0001
publishDate 2019
physical 26-33
description <jats:title>Abstract</jats:title> <jats:p>A building investment, especially in nature valuable areas, is almost always inseparable with a bigger or smaller environmental interference. For a few years there are legal regulations created to protect these areas. One of them is the requirement to conduct a habitat evaluation and to prepare a habitat report if there is a indication of significant impact on the Natura 200 site. The quality of such a report is crucial for completion an investment in a chosen localisation as well as for shortening a preparation stage with respect to environmental requirements. A defective report can result in a agreement refusal of investment completion conditions of an investment by an authorised body, and can be a reason for protests of a community which is affected by the planned investment. A well-made report, on the other hand, results in a smooth acceptance of the project without the need for consultation of the investor with the proceeding body and saving the cost of correction of a defective documentation. An review of the literature done by the authors and the talks carried out with the staff making an assessment of reports of an impact on Natura 2000 sites showed the lack of common use in practise of a formalised set of criteria of evaluation of such documents. The aim of the study was to prepare a set of evaluation criteria for reports on environmental impact on Natura 2000 sites. The set was tested on already made reports and it showed their basic omissions and disparities. The set prepared can be used by an investor in the course of making a report. It can be also a useful tool for a verifying clerk while evaluating a report for its completeness and adequacy. On the basis of the prepared set of evaluation criteria, a procedure was proposed allowing an impartial verification of reports. As a result of analyses made, a procedure was worked out which is presented in the diagram concluding this paper.</jats:p>
container_issue 1
container_start_page 26
container_title Open Engineering
container_volume 9
format_de105 Article, E-Article
format_de14 Article, E-Article
format_de15 Article, E-Article
format_de520 Article, E-Article
format_de540 Article, E-Article
format_dech1 Article, E-Article
format_ded117 Article, E-Article
format_degla1 E-Article
format_del152 Buch
format_del189 Article, E-Article
format_dezi4 Article
format_dezwi2 Article, E-Article
format_finc Article, E-Article
format_nrw Article, E-Article
_version_ 1792329478746144768
geogr_code not assigned
last_indexed 2024-03-01T13:09:50.138Z
geogr_code_person not assigned
openURL url_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fvufind.svn.sourceforge.net%3Agenerator&rft.title=Methods+of+habitat+reports%E2%80%99+evaluation&rft.date=2019-02-26&genre=article&issn=2391-5439&volume=9&issue=1&spage=26&epage=33&pages=26-33&jtitle=Open+Engineering&atitle=Methods+of+habitat+reports%E2%80%99+evaluation&aulast=Tyburski&aufirst=Jan&rft_id=info%3Adoi%2F10.1515%2Feng-2019-0001&rft.language%5B0%5D=eng
SOLR
_version_ 1792329478746144768
author Harasymiuk, Jolanta, Hanna Szafranko, Elżbieta, Tyburski, Jan
author_facet Harasymiuk, Jolanta, Hanna Szafranko, Elżbieta, Tyburski, Jan, Harasymiuk, Jolanta, Hanna Szafranko, Elżbieta, Tyburski, Jan
author_sort harasymiuk, jolanta
container_issue 1
container_start_page 26
container_title Open Engineering
container_volume 9
description <jats:title>Abstract</jats:title> <jats:p>A building investment, especially in nature valuable areas, is almost always inseparable with a bigger or smaller environmental interference. For a few years there are legal regulations created to protect these areas. One of them is the requirement to conduct a habitat evaluation and to prepare a habitat report if there is a indication of significant impact on the Natura 200 site. The quality of such a report is crucial for completion an investment in a chosen localisation as well as for shortening a preparation stage with respect to environmental requirements. A defective report can result in a agreement refusal of investment completion conditions of an investment by an authorised body, and can be a reason for protests of a community which is affected by the planned investment. A well-made report, on the other hand, results in a smooth acceptance of the project without the need for consultation of the investor with the proceeding body and saving the cost of correction of a defective documentation. An review of the literature done by the authors and the talks carried out with the staff making an assessment of reports of an impact on Natura 2000 sites showed the lack of common use in practise of a formalised set of criteria of evaluation of such documents. The aim of the study was to prepare a set of evaluation criteria for reports on environmental impact on Natura 2000 sites. The set was tested on already made reports and it showed their basic omissions and disparities. The set prepared can be used by an investor in the course of making a report. It can be also a useful tool for a verifying clerk while evaluating a report for its completeness and adequacy. On the basis of the prepared set of evaluation criteria, a procedure was proposed allowing an impartial verification of reports. As a result of analyses made, a procedure was worked out which is presented in the diagram concluding this paper.</jats:p>
doi_str_mv 10.1515/eng-2019-0001
facet_avail Online, Free
finc_class_facet Biologie, Technik, Mathematik, Physik, Geographie
format ElectronicArticle
format_de105 Article, E-Article
format_de14 Article, E-Article
format_de15 Article, E-Article
format_de520 Article, E-Article
format_de540 Article, E-Article
format_dech1 Article, E-Article
format_ded117 Article, E-Article
format_degla1 E-Article
format_del152 Buch
format_del189 Article, E-Article
format_dezi4 Article
format_dezwi2 Article, E-Article
format_finc Article, E-Article
format_nrw Article, E-Article
geogr_code not assigned
geogr_code_person not assigned
id ai-49-aHR0cDovL2R4LmRvaS5vcmcvMTAuMTUxNS9lbmctMjAxOS0wMDAx
imprint Walter de Gruyter GmbH, 2019
imprint_str_mv Walter de Gruyter GmbH, 2019
institution DE-Gla1, DE-Zi4, DE-15, DE-Rs1, DE-Pl11, DE-105, DE-14, DE-Ch1, DE-L229, DE-D275, DE-Bn3, DE-Brt1, DE-Zwi2, DE-D161
issn 2391-5439
issn_str_mv 2391-5439
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-01T13:09:50.138Z
match_str harasymiuk2019methodsofhabitatreportsevaluation
mega_collection Walter de Gruyter GmbH (CrossRef)
physical 26-33
publishDate 2019
publishDateSort 2019
publisher Walter de Gruyter GmbH
record_format ai
recordtype ai
series Open Engineering
source_id 49
spelling Harasymiuk, Jolanta Hanna Szafranko, Elżbieta Tyburski, Jan 2391-5439 Walter de Gruyter GmbH Electrical and Electronic Engineering Mechanical Engineering Aerospace Engineering General Materials Science Civil and Structural Engineering Environmental Engineering http://dx.doi.org/10.1515/eng-2019-0001 <jats:title>Abstract</jats:title> <jats:p>A building investment, especially in nature valuable areas, is almost always inseparable with a bigger or smaller environmental interference. For a few years there are legal regulations created to protect these areas. One of them is the requirement to conduct a habitat evaluation and to prepare a habitat report if there is a indication of significant impact on the Natura 200 site. The quality of such a report is crucial for completion an investment in a chosen localisation as well as for shortening a preparation stage with respect to environmental requirements. A defective report can result in a agreement refusal of investment completion conditions of an investment by an authorised body, and can be a reason for protests of a community which is affected by the planned investment. A well-made report, on the other hand, results in a smooth acceptance of the project without the need for consultation of the investor with the proceeding body and saving the cost of correction of a defective documentation. An review of the literature done by the authors and the talks carried out with the staff making an assessment of reports of an impact on Natura 2000 sites showed the lack of common use in practise of a formalised set of criteria of evaluation of such documents. The aim of the study was to prepare a set of evaluation criteria for reports on environmental impact on Natura 2000 sites. The set was tested on already made reports and it showed their basic omissions and disparities. The set prepared can be used by an investor in the course of making a report. It can be also a useful tool for a verifying clerk while evaluating a report for its completeness and adequacy. On the basis of the prepared set of evaluation criteria, a procedure was proposed allowing an impartial verification of reports. As a result of analyses made, a procedure was worked out which is presented in the diagram concluding this paper.</jats:p> Methods of habitat reports’ evaluation Open Engineering
spellingShingle Harasymiuk, Jolanta, Hanna Szafranko, Elżbieta, Tyburski, Jan, Open Engineering, Methods of habitat reports’ evaluation, Electrical and Electronic Engineering, Mechanical Engineering, Aerospace Engineering, General Materials Science, Civil and Structural Engineering, Environmental Engineering
title Methods of habitat reports’ evaluation
title_full Methods of habitat reports’ evaluation
title_fullStr Methods of habitat reports’ evaluation
title_full_unstemmed Methods of habitat reports’ evaluation
title_short Methods of habitat reports’ evaluation
title_sort methods of habitat reports’ evaluation
title_unstemmed Methods of habitat reports’ evaluation
topic Electrical and Electronic Engineering, Mechanical Engineering, Aerospace Engineering, General Materials Science, Civil and Structural Engineering, Environmental Engineering
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1515/eng-2019-0001