author_facet Digitale, Jean C.
Chang, Pearl W.
Li, Sherian X.
Kuzniewicz, Michael W.
Newman, Thomas B.
Digitale, Jean C.
Chang, Pearl W.
Li, Sherian X.
Kuzniewicz, Michael W.
Newman, Thomas B.
author Digitale, Jean C.
Chang, Pearl W.
Li, Sherian X.
Kuzniewicz, Michael W.
Newman, Thomas B.
spellingShingle Digitale, Jean C.
Chang, Pearl W.
Li, Sherian X.
Kuzniewicz, Michael W.
Newman, Thomas B.
Paediatric and Perinatal Epidemiology
The effect of hospital phototherapy on early breastmilk feeding
Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health
Epidemiology
author_sort digitale, jean c.
spelling Digitale, Jean C. Chang, Pearl W. Li, Sherian X. Kuzniewicz, Michael W. Newman, Thomas B. 0269-5022 1365-3016 Wiley Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health Epidemiology http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/ppe.12794 <jats:title>Abstract</jats:title><jats:sec><jats:title>Background</jats:title><jats:p>The effect of phototherapy on breastmilk feeding is unclear.</jats:p></jats:sec><jats:sec><jats:title>Objective</jats:title><jats:p>To estimate the effect of inpatient phototherapy on breastmilk feeding at 2‐month well‐child visits.</jats:p></jats:sec><jats:sec><jats:title>Methods</jats:title><jats:p>We performed a retrospective cohort study using electronic health record data. From births at 16 Kaiser Permanente Northern California hospitals (2013–2017), we identified a cohort of infants ≥ 35 weeks’ gestation with total serum bilirubin levels close to the American Academy of Pediatrics 2004 phototherapy threshold during their birth hospitalisation. We compared self‐reported breastmilk feeding at 2‐month well‐child visits among those who had and had not received birth hospitalisation phototherapy, adjusting for bilirubin levels and other confounding variables. We used multiple imputation (K = 200) to address missing data.</jats:p></jats:sec><jats:sec><jats:title>Results</jats:title><jats:p>Approximately a quarter of infants in the cohort (24.5%) received phototherapy during their birth hospitalisation. At the 2‐month visit, exclusive breastmilk feeding was less common (RR 0.91, 95% interval [CI] 0.88, 0.95) among those who received phototherapy (41.3%) than those who did not (45.2%). However, no association remained after adjusting for potential confounders (RR 0.99, 95% CI 0.95, 1.04; average treatment effect on the treated [ATET] −0.2%, 95% CI −2.0%, 1.5%). In contrast, any breastmilk feeding was similar between infants who did (76.8%) and did not get phototherapy (77.9%). After adjusting for confounders, phototherapy had a slightly positive association with any breastmilk feeding at 2 months (RR 1.02, 95% CI 1.00, 1.04). Among infants who received phototherapy, the proportion being fed any breastmilk at the 2‐month visit was an estimated 1.6 percentage points higher than it would have been if they had not received phototherapy (ATET 1.6%, 95% CI 0.1%, 3.1%). Multiple imputation results were similar.</jats:p></jats:sec><jats:sec><jats:title>Conclusions</jats:title><jats:p>Birth hospitalisation phototherapy can be delivered in a way that does not adversely affect breastmilk feeding at 2 months.</jats:p></jats:sec> The effect of hospital phototherapy on early breastmilk feeding Paediatric and Perinatal Epidemiology
doi_str_mv 10.1111/ppe.12794
facet_avail Online
finc_class_facet Medizin
format ElectronicArticle
fullrecord blob:ai-49-aHR0cDovL2R4LmRvaS5vcmcvMTAuMTExMS9wcGUuMTI3OTQ
id ai-49-aHR0cDovL2R4LmRvaS5vcmcvMTAuMTExMS9wcGUuMTI3OTQ
institution DE-Pl11
DE-Rs1
DE-105
DE-14
DE-Ch1
DE-L229
DE-D275
DE-Bn3
DE-Brt1
DE-D161
DE-Gla1
DE-Zi4
DE-15
imprint Wiley, 2021
imprint_str_mv Wiley, 2021
issn 0269-5022
1365-3016
issn_str_mv 0269-5022
1365-3016
language English
mega_collection Wiley (CrossRef)
match_str digitale2021theeffectofhospitalphototherapyonearlybreastmilkfeeding
publishDateSort 2021
publisher Wiley
recordtype ai
record_format ai
series Paediatric and Perinatal Epidemiology
source_id 49
title The effect of hospital phototherapy on early breastmilk feeding
title_unstemmed The effect of hospital phototherapy on early breastmilk feeding
title_full The effect of hospital phototherapy on early breastmilk feeding
title_fullStr The effect of hospital phototherapy on early breastmilk feeding
title_full_unstemmed The effect of hospital phototherapy on early breastmilk feeding
title_short The effect of hospital phototherapy on early breastmilk feeding
title_sort the effect of hospital phototherapy on early breastmilk feeding
topic Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health
Epidemiology
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/ppe.12794
publishDate 2021
physical 717-725
description <jats:title>Abstract</jats:title><jats:sec><jats:title>Background</jats:title><jats:p>The effect of phototherapy on breastmilk feeding is unclear.</jats:p></jats:sec><jats:sec><jats:title>Objective</jats:title><jats:p>To estimate the effect of inpatient phototherapy on breastmilk feeding at 2‐month well‐child visits.</jats:p></jats:sec><jats:sec><jats:title>Methods</jats:title><jats:p>We performed a retrospective cohort study using electronic health record data. From births at 16 Kaiser Permanente Northern California hospitals (2013–2017), we identified a cohort of infants ≥ 35 weeks’ gestation with total serum bilirubin levels close to the American Academy of Pediatrics 2004 phototherapy threshold during their birth hospitalisation. We compared self‐reported breastmilk feeding at 2‐month well‐child visits among those who had and had not received birth hospitalisation phototherapy, adjusting for bilirubin levels and other confounding variables. We used multiple imputation (K = 200) to address missing data.</jats:p></jats:sec><jats:sec><jats:title>Results</jats:title><jats:p>Approximately a quarter of infants in the cohort (24.5%) received phototherapy during their birth hospitalisation. At the 2‐month visit, exclusive breastmilk feeding was less common (RR 0.91, 95% interval [CI] 0.88, 0.95) among those who received phototherapy (41.3%) than those who did not (45.2%). However, no association remained after adjusting for potential confounders (RR 0.99, 95% CI 0.95, 1.04; average treatment effect on the treated [ATET] −0.2%, 95% CI −2.0%, 1.5%). In contrast, any breastmilk feeding was similar between infants who did (76.8%) and did not get phototherapy (77.9%). After adjusting for confounders, phototherapy had a slightly positive association with any breastmilk feeding at 2 months (RR 1.02, 95% CI 1.00, 1.04). Among infants who received phototherapy, the proportion being fed any breastmilk at the 2‐month visit was an estimated 1.6 percentage points higher than it would have been if they had not received phototherapy (ATET 1.6%, 95% CI 0.1%, 3.1%). Multiple imputation results were similar.</jats:p></jats:sec><jats:sec><jats:title>Conclusions</jats:title><jats:p>Birth hospitalisation phototherapy can be delivered in a way that does not adversely affect breastmilk feeding at 2 months.</jats:p></jats:sec>
container_issue 6
container_start_page 717
container_title Paediatric and Perinatal Epidemiology
container_volume 35
format_de105 Article, E-Article
format_de14 Article, E-Article
format_de15 Article, E-Article
format_de520 Article, E-Article
format_de540 Article, E-Article
format_dech1 Article, E-Article
format_ded117 Article, E-Article
format_degla1 E-Article
format_del152 Buch
format_del189 Article, E-Article
format_dezi4 Article
format_dezwi2 Article, E-Article
format_finc Article, E-Article
format_nrw Article, E-Article
_version_ 1792339008628457483
geogr_code not assigned
last_indexed 2024-03-01T15:41:18.183Z
geogr_code_person not assigned
openURL url_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fvufind.svn.sourceforge.net%3Agenerator&rft.title=The+effect+of+hospital+phototherapy+on+early+breastmilk+feeding&rft.date=2021-11-01&genre=article&issn=1365-3016&volume=35&issue=6&spage=717&epage=725&pages=717-725&jtitle=Paediatric+and+Perinatal+Epidemiology&atitle=The+effect+of+hospital+phototherapy+on+early+breastmilk+feeding&aulast=Newman&aufirst=Thomas+B.&rft_id=info%3Adoi%2F10.1111%2Fppe.12794&rft.language%5B0%5D=eng
SOLR
_version_ 1792339008628457483
author Digitale, Jean C., Chang, Pearl W., Li, Sherian X., Kuzniewicz, Michael W., Newman, Thomas B.
author_facet Digitale, Jean C., Chang, Pearl W., Li, Sherian X., Kuzniewicz, Michael W., Newman, Thomas B., Digitale, Jean C., Chang, Pearl W., Li, Sherian X., Kuzniewicz, Michael W., Newman, Thomas B.
author_sort digitale, jean c.
container_issue 6
container_start_page 717
container_title Paediatric and Perinatal Epidemiology
container_volume 35
description <jats:title>Abstract</jats:title><jats:sec><jats:title>Background</jats:title><jats:p>The effect of phototherapy on breastmilk feeding is unclear.</jats:p></jats:sec><jats:sec><jats:title>Objective</jats:title><jats:p>To estimate the effect of inpatient phototherapy on breastmilk feeding at 2‐month well‐child visits.</jats:p></jats:sec><jats:sec><jats:title>Methods</jats:title><jats:p>We performed a retrospective cohort study using electronic health record data. From births at 16 Kaiser Permanente Northern California hospitals (2013–2017), we identified a cohort of infants ≥ 35 weeks’ gestation with total serum bilirubin levels close to the American Academy of Pediatrics 2004 phototherapy threshold during their birth hospitalisation. We compared self‐reported breastmilk feeding at 2‐month well‐child visits among those who had and had not received birth hospitalisation phototherapy, adjusting for bilirubin levels and other confounding variables. We used multiple imputation (K = 200) to address missing data.</jats:p></jats:sec><jats:sec><jats:title>Results</jats:title><jats:p>Approximately a quarter of infants in the cohort (24.5%) received phototherapy during their birth hospitalisation. At the 2‐month visit, exclusive breastmilk feeding was less common (RR 0.91, 95% interval [CI] 0.88, 0.95) among those who received phototherapy (41.3%) than those who did not (45.2%). However, no association remained after adjusting for potential confounders (RR 0.99, 95% CI 0.95, 1.04; average treatment effect on the treated [ATET] −0.2%, 95% CI −2.0%, 1.5%). In contrast, any breastmilk feeding was similar between infants who did (76.8%) and did not get phototherapy (77.9%). After adjusting for confounders, phototherapy had a slightly positive association with any breastmilk feeding at 2 months (RR 1.02, 95% CI 1.00, 1.04). Among infants who received phototherapy, the proportion being fed any breastmilk at the 2‐month visit was an estimated 1.6 percentage points higher than it would have been if they had not received phototherapy (ATET 1.6%, 95% CI 0.1%, 3.1%). Multiple imputation results were similar.</jats:p></jats:sec><jats:sec><jats:title>Conclusions</jats:title><jats:p>Birth hospitalisation phototherapy can be delivered in a way that does not adversely affect breastmilk feeding at 2 months.</jats:p></jats:sec>
doi_str_mv 10.1111/ppe.12794
facet_avail Online
finc_class_facet Medizin
format ElectronicArticle
format_de105 Article, E-Article
format_de14 Article, E-Article
format_de15 Article, E-Article
format_de520 Article, E-Article
format_de540 Article, E-Article
format_dech1 Article, E-Article
format_ded117 Article, E-Article
format_degla1 E-Article
format_del152 Buch
format_del189 Article, E-Article
format_dezi4 Article
format_dezwi2 Article, E-Article
format_finc Article, E-Article
format_nrw Article, E-Article
geogr_code not assigned
geogr_code_person not assigned
id ai-49-aHR0cDovL2R4LmRvaS5vcmcvMTAuMTExMS9wcGUuMTI3OTQ
imprint Wiley, 2021
imprint_str_mv Wiley, 2021
institution DE-Pl11, DE-Rs1, DE-105, DE-14, DE-Ch1, DE-L229, DE-D275, DE-Bn3, DE-Brt1, DE-D161, DE-Gla1, DE-Zi4, DE-15
issn 0269-5022, 1365-3016
issn_str_mv 0269-5022, 1365-3016
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-01T15:41:18.183Z
match_str digitale2021theeffectofhospitalphototherapyonearlybreastmilkfeeding
mega_collection Wiley (CrossRef)
physical 717-725
publishDate 2021
publishDateSort 2021
publisher Wiley
record_format ai
recordtype ai
series Paediatric and Perinatal Epidemiology
source_id 49
spelling Digitale, Jean C. Chang, Pearl W. Li, Sherian X. Kuzniewicz, Michael W. Newman, Thomas B. 0269-5022 1365-3016 Wiley Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health Epidemiology http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/ppe.12794 <jats:title>Abstract</jats:title><jats:sec><jats:title>Background</jats:title><jats:p>The effect of phototherapy on breastmilk feeding is unclear.</jats:p></jats:sec><jats:sec><jats:title>Objective</jats:title><jats:p>To estimate the effect of inpatient phototherapy on breastmilk feeding at 2‐month well‐child visits.</jats:p></jats:sec><jats:sec><jats:title>Methods</jats:title><jats:p>We performed a retrospective cohort study using electronic health record data. From births at 16 Kaiser Permanente Northern California hospitals (2013–2017), we identified a cohort of infants ≥ 35 weeks’ gestation with total serum bilirubin levels close to the American Academy of Pediatrics 2004 phototherapy threshold during their birth hospitalisation. We compared self‐reported breastmilk feeding at 2‐month well‐child visits among those who had and had not received birth hospitalisation phototherapy, adjusting for bilirubin levels and other confounding variables. We used multiple imputation (K = 200) to address missing data.</jats:p></jats:sec><jats:sec><jats:title>Results</jats:title><jats:p>Approximately a quarter of infants in the cohort (24.5%) received phototherapy during their birth hospitalisation. At the 2‐month visit, exclusive breastmilk feeding was less common (RR 0.91, 95% interval [CI] 0.88, 0.95) among those who received phototherapy (41.3%) than those who did not (45.2%). However, no association remained after adjusting for potential confounders (RR 0.99, 95% CI 0.95, 1.04; average treatment effect on the treated [ATET] −0.2%, 95% CI −2.0%, 1.5%). In contrast, any breastmilk feeding was similar between infants who did (76.8%) and did not get phototherapy (77.9%). After adjusting for confounders, phototherapy had a slightly positive association with any breastmilk feeding at 2 months (RR 1.02, 95% CI 1.00, 1.04). Among infants who received phototherapy, the proportion being fed any breastmilk at the 2‐month visit was an estimated 1.6 percentage points higher than it would have been if they had not received phototherapy (ATET 1.6%, 95% CI 0.1%, 3.1%). Multiple imputation results were similar.</jats:p></jats:sec><jats:sec><jats:title>Conclusions</jats:title><jats:p>Birth hospitalisation phototherapy can be delivered in a way that does not adversely affect breastmilk feeding at 2 months.</jats:p></jats:sec> The effect of hospital phototherapy on early breastmilk feeding Paediatric and Perinatal Epidemiology
spellingShingle Digitale, Jean C., Chang, Pearl W., Li, Sherian X., Kuzniewicz, Michael W., Newman, Thomas B., Paediatric and Perinatal Epidemiology, The effect of hospital phototherapy on early breastmilk feeding, Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health, Epidemiology
title The effect of hospital phototherapy on early breastmilk feeding
title_full The effect of hospital phototherapy on early breastmilk feeding
title_fullStr The effect of hospital phototherapy on early breastmilk feeding
title_full_unstemmed The effect of hospital phototherapy on early breastmilk feeding
title_short The effect of hospital phototherapy on early breastmilk feeding
title_sort the effect of hospital phototherapy on early breastmilk feeding
title_unstemmed The effect of hospital phototherapy on early breastmilk feeding
topic Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health, Epidemiology
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/ppe.12794