author_facet Field, Laurie
Field, Laurie
author Field, Laurie
spellingShingle Field, Laurie
The Learning Organization
Habermas, interests and organizational learning: a critical perspective
Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management
Education
author_sort field, laurie
spelling Field, Laurie 0969-6474 Emerald Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management Education http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/tlo-04-2018-0060 <jats:sec> <jats:title content-type="abstract-subheading">Purpose</jats:title> <jats:p>This paper aims to use critical theorist Jürgen Habermas’s conceptualization of the relationship between knowledge and interests to better understand the role of common and competing interests during organizational learning.</jats:p> </jats:sec> <jats:sec> <jats:title content-type="abstract-subheading">Design/methodology/approach</jats:title> <jats:p>The paper draws on critical accounts of work and learning, and on Habermas’s theoretical work on knowledge and interests, to examine the relationship between interests and organizational learning and, in particular, to consider conflict of interest’s role in organizational learning.</jats:p> </jats:sec> <jats:sec> <jats:title content-type="abstract-subheading">Findings</jats:title> <jats:p>Transposed to organizational level, Habermas’s conceptualization of the relationship between knowledge and interests suggests that organizational learning can result from a technical interest, shaped by money and power, and from tensions and incompatibilities between the system’s technical interest and the lifeworld’s practical and emancipatory interests. There is ample evidence that the first combination does indeed account for a great deal of organizational learning but to date, very little scholarly attention has considered the possibility of organizational learning resulting from the second combination.</jats:p> </jats:sec> <jats:sec> <jats:title content-type="abstract-subheading">Originality/value</jats:title> <jats:p>Despite interests and interest differences being visible in a number of studies of learning by individuals at work, the relationship between interests and learning at the <jats:italic>organizational</jats:italic> level is not well understood. This paper is a contribution to this area, using Habermas’s conceptualization of knowledge and interests to better understand the role of interests during organizational learning, raising the possibility that competing interests can result in organizational learning, and suggesting areas for further research.</jats:p> </jats:sec> Habermas, interests and organizational learning: a critical perspective The Learning Organization
doi_str_mv 10.1108/tlo-04-2018-0060
facet_avail Online
finc_class_facet Wirtschaftswissenschaften
Pädagogik
format ElectronicArticle
fullrecord blob:ai-49-aHR0cDovL2R4LmRvaS5vcmcvMTAuMTEwOC90bG8tMDQtMjAxOC0wMDYw
id ai-49-aHR0cDovL2R4LmRvaS5vcmcvMTAuMTEwOC90bG8tMDQtMjAxOC0wMDYw
institution DE-Zi4
DE-Gla1
DE-15
DE-Pl11
DE-Rs1
DE-14
FID-BBI-DE-23
DE-105
DE-Ch1
DE-L229
DE-D275
DE-Bn3
DE-Brt1
DE-D161
imprint Emerald, 2019
imprint_str_mv Emerald, 2019
issn 0969-6474
issn_str_mv 0969-6474
language English
mega_collection Emerald (CrossRef)
match_str field2019habermasinterestsandorganizationallearningacriticalperspective
publishDateSort 2019
publisher Emerald
recordtype ai
record_format ai
series The Learning Organization
source_id 49
title Habermas, interests and organizational learning: a critical perspective
title_unstemmed Habermas, interests and organizational learning: a critical perspective
title_full Habermas, interests and organizational learning: a critical perspective
title_fullStr Habermas, interests and organizational learning: a critical perspective
title_full_unstemmed Habermas, interests and organizational learning: a critical perspective
title_short Habermas, interests and organizational learning: a critical perspective
title_sort habermas, interests and organizational learning: a critical perspective
topic Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management
Education
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/tlo-04-2018-0060
publishDate 2019
physical 252-263
description <jats:sec> <jats:title content-type="abstract-subheading">Purpose</jats:title> <jats:p>This paper aims to use critical theorist Jürgen Habermas’s conceptualization of the relationship between knowledge and interests to better understand the role of common and competing interests during organizational learning.</jats:p> </jats:sec> <jats:sec> <jats:title content-type="abstract-subheading">Design/methodology/approach</jats:title> <jats:p>The paper draws on critical accounts of work and learning, and on Habermas’s theoretical work on knowledge and interests, to examine the relationship between interests and organizational learning and, in particular, to consider conflict of interest’s role in organizational learning.</jats:p> </jats:sec> <jats:sec> <jats:title content-type="abstract-subheading">Findings</jats:title> <jats:p>Transposed to organizational level, Habermas’s conceptualization of the relationship between knowledge and interests suggests that organizational learning can result from a technical interest, shaped by money and power, and from tensions and incompatibilities between the system’s technical interest and the lifeworld’s practical and emancipatory interests. There is ample evidence that the first combination does indeed account for a great deal of organizational learning but to date, very little scholarly attention has considered the possibility of organizational learning resulting from the second combination.</jats:p> </jats:sec> <jats:sec> <jats:title content-type="abstract-subheading">Originality/value</jats:title> <jats:p>Despite interests and interest differences being visible in a number of studies of learning by individuals at work, the relationship between interests and learning at the <jats:italic>organizational</jats:italic> level is not well understood. This paper is a contribution to this area, using Habermas’s conceptualization of knowledge and interests to better understand the role of interests during organizational learning, raising the possibility that competing interests can result in organizational learning, and suggesting areas for further research.</jats:p> </jats:sec>
container_issue 3
container_start_page 252
container_title The Learning Organization
container_volume 26
format_de105 Article, E-Article
format_de14 Article, E-Article
format_de15 Article, E-Article
format_de520 Article, E-Article
format_de540 Article, E-Article
format_dech1 Article, E-Article
format_ded117 Article, E-Article
format_degla1 E-Article
format_del152 Buch
format_del189 Article, E-Article
format_dezi4 Article
format_dezwi2 Article, E-Article
format_finc Article, E-Article
format_nrw Article, E-Article
_version_ 1792348207157608452
geogr_code not assigned
last_indexed 2024-03-01T18:07:27.181Z
geogr_code_person not assigned
openURL url_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fvufind.svn.sourceforge.net%3Agenerator&rft.title=Habermas%2C+interests+and+organizational+learning%3A+a+critical+perspective&rft.date=2019-04-08&genre=article&issn=0969-6474&volume=26&issue=3&spage=252&epage=263&pages=252-263&jtitle=The+Learning+Organization&atitle=Habermas%2C+interests+and+organizational+learning%3A+a+critical+perspective&aulast=Field&aufirst=Laurie&rft_id=info%3Adoi%2F10.1108%2Ftlo-04-2018-0060&rft.language%5B0%5D=eng
SOLR
_version_ 1792348207157608452
author Field, Laurie
author_facet Field, Laurie, Field, Laurie
author_sort field, laurie
container_issue 3
container_start_page 252
container_title The Learning Organization
container_volume 26
description <jats:sec> <jats:title content-type="abstract-subheading">Purpose</jats:title> <jats:p>This paper aims to use critical theorist Jürgen Habermas’s conceptualization of the relationship between knowledge and interests to better understand the role of common and competing interests during organizational learning.</jats:p> </jats:sec> <jats:sec> <jats:title content-type="abstract-subheading">Design/methodology/approach</jats:title> <jats:p>The paper draws on critical accounts of work and learning, and on Habermas’s theoretical work on knowledge and interests, to examine the relationship between interests and organizational learning and, in particular, to consider conflict of interest’s role in organizational learning.</jats:p> </jats:sec> <jats:sec> <jats:title content-type="abstract-subheading">Findings</jats:title> <jats:p>Transposed to organizational level, Habermas’s conceptualization of the relationship between knowledge and interests suggests that organizational learning can result from a technical interest, shaped by money and power, and from tensions and incompatibilities between the system’s technical interest and the lifeworld’s practical and emancipatory interests. There is ample evidence that the first combination does indeed account for a great deal of organizational learning but to date, very little scholarly attention has considered the possibility of organizational learning resulting from the second combination.</jats:p> </jats:sec> <jats:sec> <jats:title content-type="abstract-subheading">Originality/value</jats:title> <jats:p>Despite interests and interest differences being visible in a number of studies of learning by individuals at work, the relationship between interests and learning at the <jats:italic>organizational</jats:italic> level is not well understood. This paper is a contribution to this area, using Habermas’s conceptualization of knowledge and interests to better understand the role of interests during organizational learning, raising the possibility that competing interests can result in organizational learning, and suggesting areas for further research.</jats:p> </jats:sec>
doi_str_mv 10.1108/tlo-04-2018-0060
facet_avail Online
finc_class_facet Wirtschaftswissenschaften, Pädagogik
format ElectronicArticle
format_de105 Article, E-Article
format_de14 Article, E-Article
format_de15 Article, E-Article
format_de520 Article, E-Article
format_de540 Article, E-Article
format_dech1 Article, E-Article
format_ded117 Article, E-Article
format_degla1 E-Article
format_del152 Buch
format_del189 Article, E-Article
format_dezi4 Article
format_dezwi2 Article, E-Article
format_finc Article, E-Article
format_nrw Article, E-Article
geogr_code not assigned
geogr_code_person not assigned
id ai-49-aHR0cDovL2R4LmRvaS5vcmcvMTAuMTEwOC90bG8tMDQtMjAxOC0wMDYw
imprint Emerald, 2019
imprint_str_mv Emerald, 2019
institution DE-Zi4, DE-Gla1, DE-15, DE-Pl11, DE-Rs1, DE-14, FID-BBI-DE-23, DE-105, DE-Ch1, DE-L229, DE-D275, DE-Bn3, DE-Brt1, DE-D161
issn 0969-6474
issn_str_mv 0969-6474
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-01T18:07:27.181Z
match_str field2019habermasinterestsandorganizationallearningacriticalperspective
mega_collection Emerald (CrossRef)
physical 252-263
publishDate 2019
publishDateSort 2019
publisher Emerald
record_format ai
recordtype ai
series The Learning Organization
source_id 49
spelling Field, Laurie 0969-6474 Emerald Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management Education http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/tlo-04-2018-0060 <jats:sec> <jats:title content-type="abstract-subheading">Purpose</jats:title> <jats:p>This paper aims to use critical theorist Jürgen Habermas’s conceptualization of the relationship between knowledge and interests to better understand the role of common and competing interests during organizational learning.</jats:p> </jats:sec> <jats:sec> <jats:title content-type="abstract-subheading">Design/methodology/approach</jats:title> <jats:p>The paper draws on critical accounts of work and learning, and on Habermas’s theoretical work on knowledge and interests, to examine the relationship between interests and organizational learning and, in particular, to consider conflict of interest’s role in organizational learning.</jats:p> </jats:sec> <jats:sec> <jats:title content-type="abstract-subheading">Findings</jats:title> <jats:p>Transposed to organizational level, Habermas’s conceptualization of the relationship between knowledge and interests suggests that organizational learning can result from a technical interest, shaped by money and power, and from tensions and incompatibilities between the system’s technical interest and the lifeworld’s practical and emancipatory interests. There is ample evidence that the first combination does indeed account for a great deal of organizational learning but to date, very little scholarly attention has considered the possibility of organizational learning resulting from the second combination.</jats:p> </jats:sec> <jats:sec> <jats:title content-type="abstract-subheading">Originality/value</jats:title> <jats:p>Despite interests and interest differences being visible in a number of studies of learning by individuals at work, the relationship between interests and learning at the <jats:italic>organizational</jats:italic> level is not well understood. This paper is a contribution to this area, using Habermas’s conceptualization of knowledge and interests to better understand the role of interests during organizational learning, raising the possibility that competing interests can result in organizational learning, and suggesting areas for further research.</jats:p> </jats:sec> Habermas, interests and organizational learning: a critical perspective The Learning Organization
spellingShingle Field, Laurie, The Learning Organization, Habermas, interests and organizational learning: a critical perspective, Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management, Education
title Habermas, interests and organizational learning: a critical perspective
title_full Habermas, interests and organizational learning: a critical perspective
title_fullStr Habermas, interests and organizational learning: a critical perspective
title_full_unstemmed Habermas, interests and organizational learning: a critical perspective
title_short Habermas, interests and organizational learning: a critical perspective
title_sort habermas, interests and organizational learning: a critical perspective
title_unstemmed Habermas, interests and organizational learning: a critical perspective
topic Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management, Education
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/tlo-04-2018-0060