Eintrag weiter verarbeiten
Posterior wall acetabular fracture fixation: A mechanical analysis of fixation methods
Gespeichert in:
| Zeitschriftentitel: | Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery |
|---|---|
| Personen und Körperschaften: | , , , , , , |
| In: | Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery, 27, 2019, 3, S. 230949901985983 |
| Format: | E-Article |
| Sprache: | Englisch |
| veröffentlicht: |
SAGE Publications
|
| Schlagwörter: |
| author_facet |
Pease, F Ward, AJ Stevenson, AJ Cunningham, JL Sabri, O Acharya, M Chesser, TJS Pease, F Ward, AJ Stevenson, AJ Cunningham, JL Sabri, O Acharya, M Chesser, TJS |
|---|---|
| author |
Pease, F Ward, AJ Stevenson, AJ Cunningham, JL Sabri, O Acharya, M Chesser, TJS |
| spellingShingle |
Pease, F Ward, AJ Stevenson, AJ Cunningham, JL Sabri, O Acharya, M Chesser, TJS Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery Posterior wall acetabular fracture fixation: A mechanical analysis of fixation methods Surgery |
| author_sort |
pease, f |
| spelling |
Pease, F Ward, AJ Stevenson, AJ Cunningham, JL Sabri, O Acharya, M Chesser, TJS 2309-4990 2309-4990 SAGE Publications Surgery http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/2309499019859838 <jats:p> Stable, anatomical fixation of acetabular fractures gives the best chance of successful outcome, while penetration of the acetabular articular surface with screws is associated with poor outcomes. Spring plates are an alternative to interfragmentary lag screws when penetration is a concern. A mechanical study comparing fracture stability and construct stiffness of three fixation methods for posterior wall acetabular fractures with transverse comminutions was performed. The three fixation methods tested were a posterior wall rim plate, a posterior wall buttress plate with separate lag screws and a posterior wall plate with two spring plates. Nine samples were tested, three for each fixation method. Two-dimensional motion analysis was used to measure fracture fragment displacement and construct stiffness. After two 6000 cycle-loading protocols, to a maximum 1.5 kN, the mean fracture displacement was 0.154 mm for the rim plate model, 0.326 mm for the buttress plate and 0.254 mm for the spring plate model. Mean maximum displacement was significantly less for the rim plate fixation than the buttress plate ( p = 0.015) and spring plate fixation ( p = 0.02). The rim plate was the stiffest construct 10,962 N/mm, followed by the spring plate model 5637 N/mm and the buttress plate model 4882 N/mm. Based on data obtained in this study, where possible a rim plate with interfragmentary lag screws should be used for isolated posterior wall fractures as this is the stiffest and most stable construct. When this method is not possible, spring plate fixation is a safe and a superior alternative to a posterior buttress plate method. </jats:p> Posterior wall acetabular fracture fixation: A mechanical analysis of fixation methods Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery |
| doi_str_mv |
10.1177/2309499019859838 |
| facet_avail |
Online Free |
| finc_class_facet |
Medizin |
| format |
ElectronicArticle |
| fullrecord |
blob:ai-49-aHR0cDovL2R4LmRvaS5vcmcvMTAuMTE3Ny8yMzA5NDk5MDE5ODU5ODM4 |
| id |
ai-49-aHR0cDovL2R4LmRvaS5vcmcvMTAuMTE3Ny8yMzA5NDk5MDE5ODU5ODM4 |
| institution |
DE-Pl11 DE-Rs1 DE-14 DE-105 DE-Ch1 DE-L229 DE-D275 DE-Bn3 DE-Brt1 DE-Zwi2 DE-D161 DE-Zi4 DE-Gla1 DE-15 |
| imprint |
SAGE Publications, 2019 |
| imprint_str_mv |
SAGE Publications, 2019 |
| issn |
2309-4990 |
| issn_str_mv |
2309-4990 |
| language |
English |
| mega_collection |
SAGE Publications (CrossRef) |
| match_str |
pease2019posteriorwallacetabularfracturefixationamechanicalanalysisoffixationmethods |
| publishDateSort |
2019 |
| publisher |
SAGE Publications |
| recordtype |
ai |
| record_format |
ai |
| series |
Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery |
| source_id |
49 |
| title |
Posterior wall acetabular fracture fixation: A mechanical analysis of fixation methods |
| title_unstemmed |
Posterior wall acetabular fracture fixation: A mechanical analysis of fixation methods |
| title_full |
Posterior wall acetabular fracture fixation: A mechanical analysis of fixation methods |
| title_fullStr |
Posterior wall acetabular fracture fixation: A mechanical analysis of fixation methods |
| title_full_unstemmed |
Posterior wall acetabular fracture fixation: A mechanical analysis of fixation methods |
| title_short |
Posterior wall acetabular fracture fixation: A mechanical analysis of fixation methods |
| title_sort |
posterior wall acetabular fracture fixation: a mechanical analysis of fixation methods |
| topic |
Surgery |
| url |
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/2309499019859838 |
| publishDate |
2019 |
| physical |
230949901985983 |
| description |
<jats:p> Stable, anatomical fixation of acetabular fractures gives the best chance of successful outcome, while penetration of the acetabular articular surface with screws is associated with poor outcomes. Spring plates are an alternative to interfragmentary lag screws when penetration is a concern. A mechanical study comparing fracture stability and construct stiffness of three fixation methods for posterior wall acetabular fractures with transverse comminutions was performed. The three fixation methods tested were a posterior wall rim plate, a posterior wall buttress plate with separate lag screws and a posterior wall plate with two spring plates. Nine samples were tested, three for each fixation method. Two-dimensional motion analysis was used to measure fracture fragment displacement and construct stiffness. After two 6000 cycle-loading protocols, to a maximum 1.5 kN, the mean fracture displacement was 0.154 mm for the rim plate model, 0.326 mm for the buttress plate and 0.254 mm for the spring plate model. Mean maximum displacement was significantly less for the rim plate fixation than the buttress plate ( p = 0.015) and spring plate fixation ( p = 0.02). The rim plate was the stiffest construct 10,962 N/mm, followed by the spring plate model 5637 N/mm and the buttress plate model 4882 N/mm. Based on data obtained in this study, where possible a rim plate with interfragmentary lag screws should be used for isolated posterior wall fractures as this is the stiffest and most stable construct. When this method is not possible, spring plate fixation is a safe and a superior alternative to a posterior buttress plate method. </jats:p> |
| container_issue |
3 |
| container_start_page |
0 |
| container_title |
Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery |
| container_volume |
27 |
| format_de105 |
Article, E-Article |
| format_de14 |
Article, E-Article |
| format_de15 |
Article, E-Article |
| format_de520 |
Article, E-Article |
| format_de540 |
Article, E-Article |
| format_dech1 |
Article, E-Article |
| format_ded117 |
Article, E-Article |
| format_degla1 |
E-Article |
| format_del152 |
Buch |
| format_del189 |
Article, E-Article |
| format_dezi4 |
Article |
| format_dezwi2 |
Article, E-Article |
| format_finc |
Article, E-Article |
| format_nrw |
Article, E-Article |
| _version_ |
1792347734494150659 |
| geogr_code |
not assigned |
| last_indexed |
2024-03-01T17:59:58.45Z |
| geogr_code_person |
not assigned |
| openURL |
url_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fvufind.svn.sourceforge.net%3Agenerator&rft.title=Posterior+wall+acetabular+fracture+fixation%3A+A+mechanical+analysis+of+fixation+methods&rft.date=2019-09-01&genre=article&issn=2309-4990&volume=27&issue=3&pages=230949901985983&jtitle=Journal+of+Orthopaedic+Surgery&atitle=Posterior+wall+acetabular+fracture+fixation%3A+A+mechanical+analysis+of+fixation+methods&aulast=Chesser&aufirst=TJS&rft_id=info%3Adoi%2F10.1177%2F2309499019859838&rft.language%5B0%5D=eng |
| SOLR | |
| _version_ | 1792347734494150659 |
| author | Pease, F, Ward, AJ, Stevenson, AJ, Cunningham, JL, Sabri, O, Acharya, M, Chesser, TJS |
| author_facet | Pease, F, Ward, AJ, Stevenson, AJ, Cunningham, JL, Sabri, O, Acharya, M, Chesser, TJS, Pease, F, Ward, AJ, Stevenson, AJ, Cunningham, JL, Sabri, O, Acharya, M, Chesser, TJS |
| author_sort | pease, f |
| container_issue | 3 |
| container_start_page | 0 |
| container_title | Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery |
| container_volume | 27 |
| description | <jats:p> Stable, anatomical fixation of acetabular fractures gives the best chance of successful outcome, while penetration of the acetabular articular surface with screws is associated with poor outcomes. Spring plates are an alternative to interfragmentary lag screws when penetration is a concern. A mechanical study comparing fracture stability and construct stiffness of three fixation methods for posterior wall acetabular fractures with transverse comminutions was performed. The three fixation methods tested were a posterior wall rim plate, a posterior wall buttress plate with separate lag screws and a posterior wall plate with two spring plates. Nine samples were tested, three for each fixation method. Two-dimensional motion analysis was used to measure fracture fragment displacement and construct stiffness. After two 6000 cycle-loading protocols, to a maximum 1.5 kN, the mean fracture displacement was 0.154 mm for the rim plate model, 0.326 mm for the buttress plate and 0.254 mm for the spring plate model. Mean maximum displacement was significantly less for the rim plate fixation than the buttress plate ( p = 0.015) and spring plate fixation ( p = 0.02). The rim plate was the stiffest construct 10,962 N/mm, followed by the spring plate model 5637 N/mm and the buttress plate model 4882 N/mm. Based on data obtained in this study, where possible a rim plate with interfragmentary lag screws should be used for isolated posterior wall fractures as this is the stiffest and most stable construct. When this method is not possible, spring plate fixation is a safe and a superior alternative to a posterior buttress plate method. </jats:p> |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1177/2309499019859838 |
| facet_avail | Online, Free |
| finc_class_facet | Medizin |
| format | ElectronicArticle |
| format_de105 | Article, E-Article |
| format_de14 | Article, E-Article |
| format_de15 | Article, E-Article |
| format_de520 | Article, E-Article |
| format_de540 | Article, E-Article |
| format_dech1 | Article, E-Article |
| format_ded117 | Article, E-Article |
| format_degla1 | E-Article |
| format_del152 | Buch |
| format_del189 | Article, E-Article |
| format_dezi4 | Article |
| format_dezwi2 | Article, E-Article |
| format_finc | Article, E-Article |
| format_nrw | Article, E-Article |
| geogr_code | not assigned |
| geogr_code_person | not assigned |
| id | ai-49-aHR0cDovL2R4LmRvaS5vcmcvMTAuMTE3Ny8yMzA5NDk5MDE5ODU5ODM4 |
| imprint | SAGE Publications, 2019 |
| imprint_str_mv | SAGE Publications, 2019 |
| institution | DE-Pl11, DE-Rs1, DE-14, DE-105, DE-Ch1, DE-L229, DE-D275, DE-Bn3, DE-Brt1, DE-Zwi2, DE-D161, DE-Zi4, DE-Gla1, DE-15 |
| issn | 2309-4990 |
| issn_str_mv | 2309-4990 |
| language | English |
| last_indexed | 2024-03-01T17:59:58.45Z |
| match_str | pease2019posteriorwallacetabularfracturefixationamechanicalanalysisoffixationmethods |
| mega_collection | SAGE Publications (CrossRef) |
| physical | 230949901985983 |
| publishDate | 2019 |
| publishDateSort | 2019 |
| publisher | SAGE Publications |
| record_format | ai |
| recordtype | ai |
| series | Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery |
| source_id | 49 |
| spelling | Pease, F Ward, AJ Stevenson, AJ Cunningham, JL Sabri, O Acharya, M Chesser, TJS 2309-4990 2309-4990 SAGE Publications Surgery http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/2309499019859838 <jats:p> Stable, anatomical fixation of acetabular fractures gives the best chance of successful outcome, while penetration of the acetabular articular surface with screws is associated with poor outcomes. Spring plates are an alternative to interfragmentary lag screws when penetration is a concern. A mechanical study comparing fracture stability and construct stiffness of three fixation methods for posterior wall acetabular fractures with transverse comminutions was performed. The three fixation methods tested were a posterior wall rim plate, a posterior wall buttress plate with separate lag screws and a posterior wall plate with two spring plates. Nine samples were tested, three for each fixation method. Two-dimensional motion analysis was used to measure fracture fragment displacement and construct stiffness. After two 6000 cycle-loading protocols, to a maximum 1.5 kN, the mean fracture displacement was 0.154 mm for the rim plate model, 0.326 mm for the buttress plate and 0.254 mm for the spring plate model. Mean maximum displacement was significantly less for the rim plate fixation than the buttress plate ( p = 0.015) and spring plate fixation ( p = 0.02). The rim plate was the stiffest construct 10,962 N/mm, followed by the spring plate model 5637 N/mm and the buttress plate model 4882 N/mm. Based on data obtained in this study, where possible a rim plate with interfragmentary lag screws should be used for isolated posterior wall fractures as this is the stiffest and most stable construct. When this method is not possible, spring plate fixation is a safe and a superior alternative to a posterior buttress plate method. </jats:p> Posterior wall acetabular fracture fixation: A mechanical analysis of fixation methods Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery |
| spellingShingle | Pease, F, Ward, AJ, Stevenson, AJ, Cunningham, JL, Sabri, O, Acharya, M, Chesser, TJS, Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery, Posterior wall acetabular fracture fixation: A mechanical analysis of fixation methods, Surgery |
| title | Posterior wall acetabular fracture fixation: A mechanical analysis of fixation methods |
| title_full | Posterior wall acetabular fracture fixation: A mechanical analysis of fixation methods |
| title_fullStr | Posterior wall acetabular fracture fixation: A mechanical analysis of fixation methods |
| title_full_unstemmed | Posterior wall acetabular fracture fixation: A mechanical analysis of fixation methods |
| title_short | Posterior wall acetabular fracture fixation: A mechanical analysis of fixation methods |
| title_sort | posterior wall acetabular fracture fixation: a mechanical analysis of fixation methods |
| title_unstemmed | Posterior wall acetabular fracture fixation: A mechanical analysis of fixation methods |
| topic | Surgery |
| url | http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/2309499019859838 |