author_facet Sandhu, Alexander T
Goldhaber-Fiebert, Jeremy D
Turakhia, Mintu P
Kaiser, Daniel W
Heidenreich, Paul A
Sandhu, Alexander T
Goldhaber-Fiebert, Jeremy D
Turakhia, Mintu P
Kaiser, Daniel W
Heidenreich, Paul A
author Sandhu, Alexander T
Goldhaber-Fiebert, Jeremy D
Turakhia, Mintu P
Kaiser, Daniel W
Heidenreich, Paul A
spellingShingle Sandhu, Alexander T
Goldhaber-Fiebert, Jeremy D
Turakhia, Mintu P
Kaiser, Daniel W
Heidenreich, Paul A
Circulation
Abstract 19228: Cost-effectiveness of the CardioMems Implantable Pulmonary Artery Pressure Monitoring System in Patients With Chronic Heart Failure
Physiology (medical)
Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine
author_sort sandhu, alexander t
spelling Sandhu, Alexander T Goldhaber-Fiebert, Jeremy D Turakhia, Mintu P Kaiser, Daniel W Heidenreich, Paul A 0009-7322 1524-4539 Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health) Physiology (medical) Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine http://dx.doi.org/10.1161/circ.132.suppl_3.19228 <jats:p> <jats:bold>Background:</jats:bold> For management of heart failure, the value of the CardioMems device remains uncertain. We assessed the cost-effectiveness of the CardioMems device. </jats:p> <jats:p> <jats:bold>Methods:</jats:bold> We developed a Markov model to determine quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs), cost, and cost-effectiveness of patients with heart failure receiving CardioMems implantation compared to those with routine care. In the main case analysis, we modeled the intervention in the CHAMPION trial cohort, which included patients with NYHA Class III heart failure with a heart failure hospitalization within the past twelve months. We also performed subgroup analyses of patients with preserved ejection fraction or reduced ejection fraction, and a scenario analysis of a second cohort of patients from the CHARM trials with a previous heart failure hospitalization. We obtained event rates and utilities from published trial data; we used costs from literature estimates and Medicare payment data. The main case analysis was calibrated to the hospitalization and survival rates of the CHAMPION trial. </jats:p> <jats:p> <jats:bold>Results:</jats:bold> In the CHAMPION trial main case analysis, CardioMems reduced lifetime hospitalizations (2.37 versus 3.27), increased months of survival (67 versus 62), increased QALYs (2.66 versus 2.38) and increased costs ($171,132 versus $154,084), yielding a cost of $59,520 per QALY gained or $40,301 per life-year gained. The cost per QALY gained was $71,964 in patients with reduced ejection fraction compared to $34,899 in those with preserved ejection fraction. In less ill patients from the CHARM trials, which included patients with NYHA Class II heart failure, the device cost increased to $110,565 per QALY gained. If the device cost decreased from $17,500 in the main case analysis to $15,000, the intervention would cost less than $50,000 per QALY gained. The duration of effectiveness was initially assumed to be lifelong; if less than 29 months, CardioMems would cost more than $150,000 per QALY gained. </jats:p> <jats:p> <jats:bold>Conclusion:</jats:bold> The CardioMems device is cost-effective in populations similar to the CHAMPION trial, with a cost of less than $100,000 per QALY gained, if durability of device effectiveness is sustained. Post-marketing surveillance data on the device’s durability will further clarify its value. </jats:p> Abstract 19228: Cost-effectiveness of the CardioMems Implantable Pulmonary Artery Pressure Monitoring System in Patients With Chronic Heart Failure Circulation
doi_str_mv 10.1161/circ.132.suppl_3.19228
facet_avail Online
Free
finc_class_facet Biologie
Medizin
format ElectronicArticle
fullrecord blob:ai-49-aHR0cDovL2R4LmRvaS5vcmcvMTAuMTE2MS9jaXJjLjEzMi5zdXBwbF8zLjE5MjI4
id ai-49-aHR0cDovL2R4LmRvaS5vcmcvMTAuMTE2MS9jaXJjLjEzMi5zdXBwbF8zLjE5MjI4
institution DE-Pl11
DE-Rs1
DE-105
DE-14
DE-Ch1
DE-L229
DE-D275
DE-Bn3
DE-Brt1
DE-Zwi2
DE-D161
DE-Gla1
DE-Zi4
DE-15
imprint Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health), 2015
imprint_str_mv Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health), 2015
issn 0009-7322
1524-4539
issn_str_mv 0009-7322
1524-4539
language English
mega_collection Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health) (CrossRef)
match_str sandhu2015abstract19228costeffectivenessofthecardiomemsimplantablepulmonaryarterypressuremonitoringsysteminpatientswithchronicheartfailure
publishDateSort 2015
publisher Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)
recordtype ai
record_format ai
series Circulation
source_id 49
title Abstract 19228: Cost-effectiveness of the CardioMems Implantable Pulmonary Artery Pressure Monitoring System in Patients With Chronic Heart Failure
title_unstemmed Abstract 19228: Cost-effectiveness of the CardioMems Implantable Pulmonary Artery Pressure Monitoring System in Patients With Chronic Heart Failure
title_full Abstract 19228: Cost-effectiveness of the CardioMems Implantable Pulmonary Artery Pressure Monitoring System in Patients With Chronic Heart Failure
title_fullStr Abstract 19228: Cost-effectiveness of the CardioMems Implantable Pulmonary Artery Pressure Monitoring System in Patients With Chronic Heart Failure
title_full_unstemmed Abstract 19228: Cost-effectiveness of the CardioMems Implantable Pulmonary Artery Pressure Monitoring System in Patients With Chronic Heart Failure
title_short Abstract 19228: Cost-effectiveness of the CardioMems Implantable Pulmonary Artery Pressure Monitoring System in Patients With Chronic Heart Failure
title_sort abstract 19228: cost-effectiveness of the cardiomems implantable pulmonary artery pressure monitoring system in patients with chronic heart failure
topic Physiology (medical)
Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1161/circ.132.suppl_3.19228
publishDate 2015
physical
description <jats:p> <jats:bold>Background:</jats:bold> For management of heart failure, the value of the CardioMems device remains uncertain. We assessed the cost-effectiveness of the CardioMems device. </jats:p> <jats:p> <jats:bold>Methods:</jats:bold> We developed a Markov model to determine quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs), cost, and cost-effectiveness of patients with heart failure receiving CardioMems implantation compared to those with routine care. In the main case analysis, we modeled the intervention in the CHAMPION trial cohort, which included patients with NYHA Class III heart failure with a heart failure hospitalization within the past twelve months. We also performed subgroup analyses of patients with preserved ejection fraction or reduced ejection fraction, and a scenario analysis of a second cohort of patients from the CHARM trials with a previous heart failure hospitalization. We obtained event rates and utilities from published trial data; we used costs from literature estimates and Medicare payment data. The main case analysis was calibrated to the hospitalization and survival rates of the CHAMPION trial. </jats:p> <jats:p> <jats:bold>Results:</jats:bold> In the CHAMPION trial main case analysis, CardioMems reduced lifetime hospitalizations (2.37 versus 3.27), increased months of survival (67 versus 62), increased QALYs (2.66 versus 2.38) and increased costs ($171,132 versus $154,084), yielding a cost of $59,520 per QALY gained or $40,301 per life-year gained. The cost per QALY gained was $71,964 in patients with reduced ejection fraction compared to $34,899 in those with preserved ejection fraction. In less ill patients from the CHARM trials, which included patients with NYHA Class II heart failure, the device cost increased to $110,565 per QALY gained. If the device cost decreased from $17,500 in the main case analysis to $15,000, the intervention would cost less than $50,000 per QALY gained. The duration of effectiveness was initially assumed to be lifelong; if less than 29 months, CardioMems would cost more than $150,000 per QALY gained. </jats:p> <jats:p> <jats:bold>Conclusion:</jats:bold> The CardioMems device is cost-effective in populations similar to the CHAMPION trial, with a cost of less than $100,000 per QALY gained, if durability of device effectiveness is sustained. Post-marketing surveillance data on the device’s durability will further clarify its value. </jats:p>
container_issue suppl_3
container_start_page 0
container_title Circulation
container_volume 132
format_de105 Article, E-Article
format_de14 Article, E-Article
format_de15 Article, E-Article
format_de520 Article, E-Article
format_de540 Article, E-Article
format_dech1 Article, E-Article
format_ded117 Article, E-Article
format_degla1 E-Article
format_del152 Buch
format_del189 Article, E-Article
format_dezi4 Article
format_dezwi2 Article, E-Article
format_finc Article, E-Article
format_nrw Article, E-Article
_version_ 1792328375285579777
geogr_code not assigned
last_indexed 2024-03-01T12:51:56.755Z
geogr_code_person not assigned
openURL url_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fvufind.svn.sourceforge.net%3Agenerator&rft.title=Abstract+19228%3A+Cost-effectiveness+of+the+CardioMems+Implantable+Pulmonary+Artery+Pressure+Monitoring+System+in+Patients+With+Chronic+Heart+Failure&rft.date=2015-11-10&genre=article&issn=1524-4539&volume=132&issue=suppl_3&jtitle=Circulation&atitle=Abstract+19228%3A+Cost-effectiveness+of+the+CardioMems+Implantable+Pulmonary+Artery+Pressure+Monitoring+System+in+Patients+With+Chronic+Heart+Failure&aulast=Heidenreich&aufirst=Paul+A&rft_id=info%3Adoi%2F10.1161%2Fcirc.132.suppl_3.19228&rft.language%5B0%5D=eng
SOLR
_version_ 1792328375285579777
author Sandhu, Alexander T, Goldhaber-Fiebert, Jeremy D, Turakhia, Mintu P, Kaiser, Daniel W, Heidenreich, Paul A
author_facet Sandhu, Alexander T, Goldhaber-Fiebert, Jeremy D, Turakhia, Mintu P, Kaiser, Daniel W, Heidenreich, Paul A, Sandhu, Alexander T, Goldhaber-Fiebert, Jeremy D, Turakhia, Mintu P, Kaiser, Daniel W, Heidenreich, Paul A
author_sort sandhu, alexander t
container_issue suppl_3
container_start_page 0
container_title Circulation
container_volume 132
description <jats:p> <jats:bold>Background:</jats:bold> For management of heart failure, the value of the CardioMems device remains uncertain. We assessed the cost-effectiveness of the CardioMems device. </jats:p> <jats:p> <jats:bold>Methods:</jats:bold> We developed a Markov model to determine quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs), cost, and cost-effectiveness of patients with heart failure receiving CardioMems implantation compared to those with routine care. In the main case analysis, we modeled the intervention in the CHAMPION trial cohort, which included patients with NYHA Class III heart failure with a heart failure hospitalization within the past twelve months. We also performed subgroup analyses of patients with preserved ejection fraction or reduced ejection fraction, and a scenario analysis of a second cohort of patients from the CHARM trials with a previous heart failure hospitalization. We obtained event rates and utilities from published trial data; we used costs from literature estimates and Medicare payment data. The main case analysis was calibrated to the hospitalization and survival rates of the CHAMPION trial. </jats:p> <jats:p> <jats:bold>Results:</jats:bold> In the CHAMPION trial main case analysis, CardioMems reduced lifetime hospitalizations (2.37 versus 3.27), increased months of survival (67 versus 62), increased QALYs (2.66 versus 2.38) and increased costs ($171,132 versus $154,084), yielding a cost of $59,520 per QALY gained or $40,301 per life-year gained. The cost per QALY gained was $71,964 in patients with reduced ejection fraction compared to $34,899 in those with preserved ejection fraction. In less ill patients from the CHARM trials, which included patients with NYHA Class II heart failure, the device cost increased to $110,565 per QALY gained. If the device cost decreased from $17,500 in the main case analysis to $15,000, the intervention would cost less than $50,000 per QALY gained. The duration of effectiveness was initially assumed to be lifelong; if less than 29 months, CardioMems would cost more than $150,000 per QALY gained. </jats:p> <jats:p> <jats:bold>Conclusion:</jats:bold> The CardioMems device is cost-effective in populations similar to the CHAMPION trial, with a cost of less than $100,000 per QALY gained, if durability of device effectiveness is sustained. Post-marketing surveillance data on the device’s durability will further clarify its value. </jats:p>
doi_str_mv 10.1161/circ.132.suppl_3.19228
facet_avail Online, Free
finc_class_facet Biologie, Medizin
format ElectronicArticle
format_de105 Article, E-Article
format_de14 Article, E-Article
format_de15 Article, E-Article
format_de520 Article, E-Article
format_de540 Article, E-Article
format_dech1 Article, E-Article
format_ded117 Article, E-Article
format_degla1 E-Article
format_del152 Buch
format_del189 Article, E-Article
format_dezi4 Article
format_dezwi2 Article, E-Article
format_finc Article, E-Article
format_nrw Article, E-Article
geogr_code not assigned
geogr_code_person not assigned
id ai-49-aHR0cDovL2R4LmRvaS5vcmcvMTAuMTE2MS9jaXJjLjEzMi5zdXBwbF8zLjE5MjI4
imprint Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health), 2015
imprint_str_mv Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health), 2015
institution DE-Pl11, DE-Rs1, DE-105, DE-14, DE-Ch1, DE-L229, DE-D275, DE-Bn3, DE-Brt1, DE-Zwi2, DE-D161, DE-Gla1, DE-Zi4, DE-15
issn 0009-7322, 1524-4539
issn_str_mv 0009-7322, 1524-4539
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-01T12:51:56.755Z
match_str sandhu2015abstract19228costeffectivenessofthecardiomemsimplantablepulmonaryarterypressuremonitoringsysteminpatientswithchronicheartfailure
mega_collection Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health) (CrossRef)
physical
publishDate 2015
publishDateSort 2015
publisher Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)
record_format ai
recordtype ai
series Circulation
source_id 49
spelling Sandhu, Alexander T Goldhaber-Fiebert, Jeremy D Turakhia, Mintu P Kaiser, Daniel W Heidenreich, Paul A 0009-7322 1524-4539 Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health) Physiology (medical) Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine http://dx.doi.org/10.1161/circ.132.suppl_3.19228 <jats:p> <jats:bold>Background:</jats:bold> For management of heart failure, the value of the CardioMems device remains uncertain. We assessed the cost-effectiveness of the CardioMems device. </jats:p> <jats:p> <jats:bold>Methods:</jats:bold> We developed a Markov model to determine quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs), cost, and cost-effectiveness of patients with heart failure receiving CardioMems implantation compared to those with routine care. In the main case analysis, we modeled the intervention in the CHAMPION trial cohort, which included patients with NYHA Class III heart failure with a heart failure hospitalization within the past twelve months. We also performed subgroup analyses of patients with preserved ejection fraction or reduced ejection fraction, and a scenario analysis of a second cohort of patients from the CHARM trials with a previous heart failure hospitalization. We obtained event rates and utilities from published trial data; we used costs from literature estimates and Medicare payment data. The main case analysis was calibrated to the hospitalization and survival rates of the CHAMPION trial. </jats:p> <jats:p> <jats:bold>Results:</jats:bold> In the CHAMPION trial main case analysis, CardioMems reduced lifetime hospitalizations (2.37 versus 3.27), increased months of survival (67 versus 62), increased QALYs (2.66 versus 2.38) and increased costs ($171,132 versus $154,084), yielding a cost of $59,520 per QALY gained or $40,301 per life-year gained. The cost per QALY gained was $71,964 in patients with reduced ejection fraction compared to $34,899 in those with preserved ejection fraction. In less ill patients from the CHARM trials, which included patients with NYHA Class II heart failure, the device cost increased to $110,565 per QALY gained. If the device cost decreased from $17,500 in the main case analysis to $15,000, the intervention would cost less than $50,000 per QALY gained. The duration of effectiveness was initially assumed to be lifelong; if less than 29 months, CardioMems would cost more than $150,000 per QALY gained. </jats:p> <jats:p> <jats:bold>Conclusion:</jats:bold> The CardioMems device is cost-effective in populations similar to the CHAMPION trial, with a cost of less than $100,000 per QALY gained, if durability of device effectiveness is sustained. Post-marketing surveillance data on the device’s durability will further clarify its value. </jats:p> Abstract 19228: Cost-effectiveness of the CardioMems Implantable Pulmonary Artery Pressure Monitoring System in Patients With Chronic Heart Failure Circulation
spellingShingle Sandhu, Alexander T, Goldhaber-Fiebert, Jeremy D, Turakhia, Mintu P, Kaiser, Daniel W, Heidenreich, Paul A, Circulation, Abstract 19228: Cost-effectiveness of the CardioMems Implantable Pulmonary Artery Pressure Monitoring System in Patients With Chronic Heart Failure, Physiology (medical), Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine
title Abstract 19228: Cost-effectiveness of the CardioMems Implantable Pulmonary Artery Pressure Monitoring System in Patients With Chronic Heart Failure
title_full Abstract 19228: Cost-effectiveness of the CardioMems Implantable Pulmonary Artery Pressure Monitoring System in Patients With Chronic Heart Failure
title_fullStr Abstract 19228: Cost-effectiveness of the CardioMems Implantable Pulmonary Artery Pressure Monitoring System in Patients With Chronic Heart Failure
title_full_unstemmed Abstract 19228: Cost-effectiveness of the CardioMems Implantable Pulmonary Artery Pressure Monitoring System in Patients With Chronic Heart Failure
title_short Abstract 19228: Cost-effectiveness of the CardioMems Implantable Pulmonary Artery Pressure Monitoring System in Patients With Chronic Heart Failure
title_sort abstract 19228: cost-effectiveness of the cardiomems implantable pulmonary artery pressure monitoring system in patients with chronic heart failure
title_unstemmed Abstract 19228: Cost-effectiveness of the CardioMems Implantable Pulmonary Artery Pressure Monitoring System in Patients With Chronic Heart Failure
topic Physiology (medical), Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1161/circ.132.suppl_3.19228