Eintrag weiter verarbeiten
Conditional Probability and Dutch Books
Gespeichert in:
Zeitschriftentitel: | Philosophy of Science |
---|---|
Personen und Körperschaften: | |
In: | Philosophy of Science, 67, 2000, 3, S. 391-409 |
Format: | E-Article |
Sprache: | Englisch |
veröffentlicht: |
Cambridge University Press (CUP)
|
Schlagwörter: |
author_facet |
Döring, Frank Döring, Frank |
---|---|
author |
Döring, Frank |
spellingShingle |
Döring, Frank Philosophy of Science Conditional Probability and Dutch Books History and Philosophy of Science Philosophy History |
author_sort |
döring, frank |
spelling |
Döring, Frank 0031-8248 1539-767X Cambridge University Press (CUP) History and Philosophy of Science Philosophy History http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/392787 <jats:p>There is no set <jats:italic>Δ</jats:italic> of probability axioms that meets the following three desiderata: <jats:list list-type="simple"><jats:list-item><jats:p>(1) <jats:italic>Δ</jats:italic> is vindicated by a Dutch book theorem;</jats:p></jats:list-item><jats:list-item><jats:p>(2) <jats:italic>Δ</jats:italic> does not imply regularity (and thus allows, among other things, updating by conditionalization);</jats:p></jats:list-item><jats:list-item><jats:p>(3) <jats:italic>Δ</jats:italic> constrains the conditional probability <jats:italic>q</jats:italic>(·, z) even when the unconditional probability <jats:italic>p</jats:italic>(<jats:italic>z</jats:italic>) (= <jats:italic>q</jats:italic>(<jats:italic>z, T</jats:italic>)) equals 0.</jats:p></jats:list-item><jats:list-item><jats:p>This has significant consequences for Bayesian epistemology, some of which are discussed.</jats:p></jats:list-item></jats:list></jats:p> Conditional Probability and Dutch Books Philosophy of Science |
doi_str_mv |
10.1086/392787 |
facet_avail |
Online |
finc_class_facet |
Geschichte Philosophie |
format |
ElectronicArticle |
fullrecord |
blob:ai-49-aHR0cDovL2R4LmRvaS5vcmcvMTAuMTA4Ni8zOTI3ODc |
id |
ai-49-aHR0cDovL2R4LmRvaS5vcmcvMTAuMTA4Ni8zOTI3ODc |
institution |
DE-15 DE-Pl11 DE-Rs1 DE-105 DE-14 DE-Ch1 DE-L229 DE-D275 DE-Bn3 DE-Brt1 DE-D161 DE-Gla1 DE-Zi4 |
imprint |
Cambridge University Press (CUP), 2000 |
imprint_str_mv |
Cambridge University Press (CUP), 2000 |
issn |
0031-8248 1539-767X |
issn_str_mv |
0031-8248 1539-767X |
language |
English |
mega_collection |
Cambridge University Press (CUP) (CrossRef) |
match_str |
doring2000conditionalprobabilityanddutchbooks |
publishDateSort |
2000 |
publisher |
Cambridge University Press (CUP) |
recordtype |
ai |
record_format |
ai |
series |
Philosophy of Science |
source_id |
49 |
title |
Conditional Probability and Dutch Books |
title_unstemmed |
Conditional Probability and Dutch Books |
title_full |
Conditional Probability and Dutch Books |
title_fullStr |
Conditional Probability and Dutch Books |
title_full_unstemmed |
Conditional Probability and Dutch Books |
title_short |
Conditional Probability and Dutch Books |
title_sort |
conditional probability and dutch books |
topic |
History and Philosophy of Science Philosophy History |
url |
http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/392787 |
publishDate |
2000 |
physical |
391-409 |
description |
<jats:p>There is no set <jats:italic>Δ</jats:italic> of probability axioms that meets the following three desiderata:
<jats:list list-type="simple"><jats:list-item><jats:p>(1) <jats:italic>Δ</jats:italic> is vindicated by a Dutch book theorem;</jats:p></jats:list-item><jats:list-item><jats:p>(2) <jats:italic>Δ</jats:italic> does not imply regularity (and thus allows, among other things, updating by conditionalization);</jats:p></jats:list-item><jats:list-item><jats:p>(3) <jats:italic>Δ</jats:italic> constrains the conditional probability <jats:italic>q</jats:italic>(·, z) even when the unconditional probability <jats:italic>p</jats:italic>(<jats:italic>z</jats:italic>) (= <jats:italic>q</jats:italic>(<jats:italic>z, T</jats:italic>)) equals 0.</jats:p></jats:list-item><jats:list-item><jats:p>This has significant consequences for Bayesian epistemology, some of which are discussed.</jats:p></jats:list-item></jats:list></jats:p> |
container_issue |
3 |
container_start_page |
391 |
container_title |
Philosophy of Science |
container_volume |
67 |
format_de105 |
Article, E-Article |
format_de14 |
Article, E-Article |
format_de15 |
Article, E-Article |
format_de520 |
Article, E-Article |
format_de540 |
Article, E-Article |
format_dech1 |
Article, E-Article |
format_ded117 |
Article, E-Article |
format_degla1 |
E-Article |
format_del152 |
Buch |
format_del189 |
Article, E-Article |
format_dezi4 |
Article |
format_dezwi2 |
Article, E-Article |
format_finc |
Article, E-Article |
format_nrw |
Article, E-Article |
_version_ |
1792335861453422597 |
geogr_code |
not assigned |
last_indexed |
2024-03-01T14:50:50.419Z |
geogr_code_person |
not assigned |
openURL |
url_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fvufind.svn.sourceforge.net%3Agenerator&rft.title=Conditional+Probability+and+Dutch+Books&rft.date=2000-09-01&genre=article&issn=1539-767X&volume=67&issue=3&spage=391&epage=409&pages=391-409&jtitle=Philosophy+of+Science&atitle=Conditional+Probability+and+Dutch+Books&aulast=D%C3%B6ring&aufirst=Frank&rft_id=info%3Adoi%2F10.1086%2F392787&rft.language%5B0%5D=eng |
SOLR | |
_version_ | 1792335861453422597 |
author | Döring, Frank |
author_facet | Döring, Frank, Döring, Frank |
author_sort | döring, frank |
container_issue | 3 |
container_start_page | 391 |
container_title | Philosophy of Science |
container_volume | 67 |
description | <jats:p>There is no set <jats:italic>Δ</jats:italic> of probability axioms that meets the following three desiderata: <jats:list list-type="simple"><jats:list-item><jats:p>(1) <jats:italic>Δ</jats:italic> is vindicated by a Dutch book theorem;</jats:p></jats:list-item><jats:list-item><jats:p>(2) <jats:italic>Δ</jats:italic> does not imply regularity (and thus allows, among other things, updating by conditionalization);</jats:p></jats:list-item><jats:list-item><jats:p>(3) <jats:italic>Δ</jats:italic> constrains the conditional probability <jats:italic>q</jats:italic>(·, z) even when the unconditional probability <jats:italic>p</jats:italic>(<jats:italic>z</jats:italic>) (= <jats:italic>q</jats:italic>(<jats:italic>z, T</jats:italic>)) equals 0.</jats:p></jats:list-item><jats:list-item><jats:p>This has significant consequences for Bayesian epistemology, some of which are discussed.</jats:p></jats:list-item></jats:list></jats:p> |
doi_str_mv | 10.1086/392787 |
facet_avail | Online |
finc_class_facet | Geschichte, Philosophie |
format | ElectronicArticle |
format_de105 | Article, E-Article |
format_de14 | Article, E-Article |
format_de15 | Article, E-Article |
format_de520 | Article, E-Article |
format_de540 | Article, E-Article |
format_dech1 | Article, E-Article |
format_ded117 | Article, E-Article |
format_degla1 | E-Article |
format_del152 | Buch |
format_del189 | Article, E-Article |
format_dezi4 | Article |
format_dezwi2 | Article, E-Article |
format_finc | Article, E-Article |
format_nrw | Article, E-Article |
geogr_code | not assigned |
geogr_code_person | not assigned |
id | ai-49-aHR0cDovL2R4LmRvaS5vcmcvMTAuMTA4Ni8zOTI3ODc |
imprint | Cambridge University Press (CUP), 2000 |
imprint_str_mv | Cambridge University Press (CUP), 2000 |
institution | DE-15, DE-Pl11, DE-Rs1, DE-105, DE-14, DE-Ch1, DE-L229, DE-D275, DE-Bn3, DE-Brt1, DE-D161, DE-Gla1, DE-Zi4 |
issn | 0031-8248, 1539-767X |
issn_str_mv | 0031-8248, 1539-767X |
language | English |
last_indexed | 2024-03-01T14:50:50.419Z |
match_str | doring2000conditionalprobabilityanddutchbooks |
mega_collection | Cambridge University Press (CUP) (CrossRef) |
physical | 391-409 |
publishDate | 2000 |
publishDateSort | 2000 |
publisher | Cambridge University Press (CUP) |
record_format | ai |
recordtype | ai |
series | Philosophy of Science |
source_id | 49 |
spelling | Döring, Frank 0031-8248 1539-767X Cambridge University Press (CUP) History and Philosophy of Science Philosophy History http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/392787 <jats:p>There is no set <jats:italic>Δ</jats:italic> of probability axioms that meets the following three desiderata: <jats:list list-type="simple"><jats:list-item><jats:p>(1) <jats:italic>Δ</jats:italic> is vindicated by a Dutch book theorem;</jats:p></jats:list-item><jats:list-item><jats:p>(2) <jats:italic>Δ</jats:italic> does not imply regularity (and thus allows, among other things, updating by conditionalization);</jats:p></jats:list-item><jats:list-item><jats:p>(3) <jats:italic>Δ</jats:italic> constrains the conditional probability <jats:italic>q</jats:italic>(·, z) even when the unconditional probability <jats:italic>p</jats:italic>(<jats:italic>z</jats:italic>) (= <jats:italic>q</jats:italic>(<jats:italic>z, T</jats:italic>)) equals 0.</jats:p></jats:list-item><jats:list-item><jats:p>This has significant consequences for Bayesian epistemology, some of which are discussed.</jats:p></jats:list-item></jats:list></jats:p> Conditional Probability and Dutch Books Philosophy of Science |
spellingShingle | Döring, Frank, Philosophy of Science, Conditional Probability and Dutch Books, History and Philosophy of Science, Philosophy, History |
title | Conditional Probability and Dutch Books |
title_full | Conditional Probability and Dutch Books |
title_fullStr | Conditional Probability and Dutch Books |
title_full_unstemmed | Conditional Probability and Dutch Books |
title_short | Conditional Probability and Dutch Books |
title_sort | conditional probability and dutch books |
title_unstemmed | Conditional Probability and Dutch Books |
topic | History and Philosophy of Science, Philosophy, History |
url | http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/392787 |