Eintrag weiter verarbeiten
Why Bayesian Psychology Is Incomplete
Gespeichert in:
Zeitschriftentitel: | Philosophy of Science |
---|---|
Personen und Körperschaften: | |
In: | Philosophy of Science, 66, 1999, S3, S. S379-S389 |
Format: | E-Article |
Sprache: | Englisch |
veröffentlicht: |
Cambridge University Press (CUP)
|
Schlagwörter: |
author_facet |
Döring, Frank Döring, Frank |
---|---|
author |
Döring, Frank |
spellingShingle |
Döring, Frank Philosophy of Science Why Bayesian Psychology Is Incomplete History and Philosophy of Science Philosophy History |
author_sort |
döring, frank |
spelling |
Döring, Frank 0031-8248 1539-767X Cambridge University Press (CUP) History and Philosophy of Science Philosophy History http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/392739 <jats:p>Bayesian psychology, in what is perhaps its most familiar version, is incomplete: Jeffrey conditionalization is not a complete account of rational belief change. Jeffrey conditionalization is sensitive to the order in which the evidence arrives. This order effect can be so pronounced as to call for a belief adjustment that cannot be understood as an assimilation of incoming evidence by Jeffrey's rule. Hartry Field's reparameterization of Jeffrey's rule avoids the order effect but fails as an account of how new evidence should be assimilated.</jats:p> Why Bayesian Psychology Is Incomplete Philosophy of Science |
doi_str_mv |
10.1086/392739 |
facet_avail |
Online |
finc_class_facet |
Philosophie Geschichte |
format |
ElectronicArticle |
fullrecord |
blob:ai-49-aHR0cDovL2R4LmRvaS5vcmcvMTAuMTA4Ni8zOTI3Mzk |
id |
ai-49-aHR0cDovL2R4LmRvaS5vcmcvMTAuMTA4Ni8zOTI3Mzk |
institution |
DE-D275 DE-Bn3 DE-Brt1 DE-D161 DE-Gla1 DE-Zi4 DE-15 DE-Pl11 DE-Rs1 DE-105 DE-14 DE-Ch1 DE-L229 |
imprint |
Cambridge University Press (CUP), 1999 |
imprint_str_mv |
Cambridge University Press (CUP), 1999 |
issn |
1539-767X 0031-8248 |
issn_str_mv |
1539-767X 0031-8248 |
language |
English |
mega_collection |
Cambridge University Press (CUP) (CrossRef) |
match_str |
doring1999whybayesianpsychologyisincomplete |
publishDateSort |
1999 |
publisher |
Cambridge University Press (CUP) |
recordtype |
ai |
record_format |
ai |
series |
Philosophy of Science |
source_id |
49 |
title |
Why Bayesian Psychology Is Incomplete |
title_unstemmed |
Why Bayesian Psychology Is Incomplete |
title_full |
Why Bayesian Psychology Is Incomplete |
title_fullStr |
Why Bayesian Psychology Is Incomplete |
title_full_unstemmed |
Why Bayesian Psychology Is Incomplete |
title_short |
Why Bayesian Psychology Is Incomplete |
title_sort |
why bayesian psychology is incomplete |
topic |
History and Philosophy of Science Philosophy History |
url |
http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/392739 |
publishDate |
1999 |
physical |
S379-S389 |
description |
<jats:p>Bayesian psychology, in what is perhaps its most familiar version, is incomplete: Jeffrey conditionalization is not a complete account of rational belief change. Jeffrey conditionalization is sensitive to the order in which the evidence arrives. This order effect can be so pronounced as to call for a belief adjustment that cannot be understood as an assimilation of incoming evidence by Jeffrey's rule. Hartry Field's reparameterization of Jeffrey's rule avoids the order effect but fails as an account of how new evidence should be assimilated.</jats:p> |
container_issue |
S3 |
container_start_page |
0 |
container_title |
Philosophy of Science |
container_volume |
66 |
format_de105 |
Article, E-Article |
format_de14 |
Article, E-Article |
format_de15 |
Article, E-Article |
format_de520 |
Article, E-Article |
format_de540 |
Article, E-Article |
format_dech1 |
Article, E-Article |
format_ded117 |
Article, E-Article |
format_degla1 |
E-Article |
format_del152 |
Buch |
format_del189 |
Article, E-Article |
format_dezi4 |
Article |
format_dezwi2 |
Article, E-Article |
format_finc |
Article, E-Article |
format_nrw |
Article, E-Article |
_version_ |
1792339634460557313 |
geogr_code |
not assigned |
last_indexed |
2024-03-01T15:51:15.353Z |
geogr_code_person |
not assigned |
openURL |
url_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fvufind.svn.sourceforge.net%3Agenerator&rft.title=Why+Bayesian+Psychology+Is+Incomplete&rft.date=1999-01-01&genre=article&issn=1539-767X&volume=66&issue=S3&pages=S379-S389&jtitle=Philosophy+of+Science&atitle=Why+Bayesian+Psychology+Is+Incomplete&aulast=D%C3%B6ring&aufirst=Frank&rft_id=info%3Adoi%2F10.1086%2F392739&rft.language%5B0%5D=eng |
SOLR | |
_version_ | 1792339634460557313 |
author | Döring, Frank |
author_facet | Döring, Frank, Döring, Frank |
author_sort | döring, frank |
container_issue | S3 |
container_start_page | 0 |
container_title | Philosophy of Science |
container_volume | 66 |
description | <jats:p>Bayesian psychology, in what is perhaps its most familiar version, is incomplete: Jeffrey conditionalization is not a complete account of rational belief change. Jeffrey conditionalization is sensitive to the order in which the evidence arrives. This order effect can be so pronounced as to call for a belief adjustment that cannot be understood as an assimilation of incoming evidence by Jeffrey's rule. Hartry Field's reparameterization of Jeffrey's rule avoids the order effect but fails as an account of how new evidence should be assimilated.</jats:p> |
doi_str_mv | 10.1086/392739 |
facet_avail | Online |
finc_class_facet | Philosophie, Geschichte |
format | ElectronicArticle |
format_de105 | Article, E-Article |
format_de14 | Article, E-Article |
format_de15 | Article, E-Article |
format_de520 | Article, E-Article |
format_de540 | Article, E-Article |
format_dech1 | Article, E-Article |
format_ded117 | Article, E-Article |
format_degla1 | E-Article |
format_del152 | Buch |
format_del189 | Article, E-Article |
format_dezi4 | Article |
format_dezwi2 | Article, E-Article |
format_finc | Article, E-Article |
format_nrw | Article, E-Article |
geogr_code | not assigned |
geogr_code_person | not assigned |
id | ai-49-aHR0cDovL2R4LmRvaS5vcmcvMTAuMTA4Ni8zOTI3Mzk |
imprint | Cambridge University Press (CUP), 1999 |
imprint_str_mv | Cambridge University Press (CUP), 1999 |
institution | DE-D275, DE-Bn3, DE-Brt1, DE-D161, DE-Gla1, DE-Zi4, DE-15, DE-Pl11, DE-Rs1, DE-105, DE-14, DE-Ch1, DE-L229 |
issn | 1539-767X, 0031-8248 |
issn_str_mv | 1539-767X, 0031-8248 |
language | English |
last_indexed | 2024-03-01T15:51:15.353Z |
match_str | doring1999whybayesianpsychologyisincomplete |
mega_collection | Cambridge University Press (CUP) (CrossRef) |
physical | S379-S389 |
publishDate | 1999 |
publishDateSort | 1999 |
publisher | Cambridge University Press (CUP) |
record_format | ai |
recordtype | ai |
series | Philosophy of Science |
source_id | 49 |
spelling | Döring, Frank 0031-8248 1539-767X Cambridge University Press (CUP) History and Philosophy of Science Philosophy History http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/392739 <jats:p>Bayesian psychology, in what is perhaps its most familiar version, is incomplete: Jeffrey conditionalization is not a complete account of rational belief change. Jeffrey conditionalization is sensitive to the order in which the evidence arrives. This order effect can be so pronounced as to call for a belief adjustment that cannot be understood as an assimilation of incoming evidence by Jeffrey's rule. Hartry Field's reparameterization of Jeffrey's rule avoids the order effect but fails as an account of how new evidence should be assimilated.</jats:p> Why Bayesian Psychology Is Incomplete Philosophy of Science |
spellingShingle | Döring, Frank, Philosophy of Science, Why Bayesian Psychology Is Incomplete, History and Philosophy of Science, Philosophy, History |
title | Why Bayesian Psychology Is Incomplete |
title_full | Why Bayesian Psychology Is Incomplete |
title_fullStr | Why Bayesian Psychology Is Incomplete |
title_full_unstemmed | Why Bayesian Psychology Is Incomplete |
title_short | Why Bayesian Psychology Is Incomplete |
title_sort | why bayesian psychology is incomplete |
title_unstemmed | Why Bayesian Psychology Is Incomplete |
topic | History and Philosophy of Science, Philosophy, History |
url | http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/392739 |